Non DubitoA Mind in Many Languages
Search搜索搜尋
EN

Work, temperament & writing工作、脾气与写作工作、脾氣與寫作

I Deliver Parcels in Beijing: What Does Work Do to a Person?

《我在北京送快递》:工作会把一个人变成什么样

《我在北京送快遞》:工作會把一個人變成什麼樣

Nineteen jobs, a four-minute calculation, and years of reading and writing beyond the label of courier.

十九份工作、四分钟一件的时间账,以及快递员身份之外持续多年的阅读与写作。

十九份工作、四分鐘一件的時間賬,以及快遞員身份之外持續多年的閱讀與寫作。

Original title原书名原書名: 我在北京送快递 · Chinese中文中文

Hu Anyan · 胡安焉 · Working-life memoir劳动生活记述勞動生活記述

Original publication原作首版原作首版 · Hunan Literature and Art / Puru Culture

Han Qin (秦汉) · Guide published导读发布導讀發佈

An introduction based on the public materials identified below, not a reading of the complete book. The author's account, later interviews or research, and this essay's own interpretations are kept distinct.

本文依据下方说明的公开材料写作,未通读全书;区分书内记述、后续访谈或研究与本文的分析,不代替原作。

本文依據下方說明的公開材料寫作,未通讀全書;區分書內記述、後續訪談或研究與本文的分析,不代替原作。

While delivering parcels, Hu Anyan calculated a price for his time. Given his income target and payment per delivery, he needed to average one parcel every four minutes. This was not a corporate slogan on a wall. It was his own calculation of whether the job could continue to support him. Lunch entered the calculation too: buying food cost money, while waiting and eating consumed delivery time. An ordinary meal became more expensive than its menu price.

Knowing this changes how a hurried voice on the telephone may sound. A recipient's “just a moment” is genuinely brief within their own day. The courier is also counting time for parcels still to come. He may know perfectly well that a gentler tone would help, while finding it harder to maintain as the day proceeds.

Published in 2023 by Hunan Literature and Art through Puru Culture, I Deliver Parcels in Beijing describes such lives. Yet its title covers only part of the book. Hu held nineteen jobs over roughly twenty years, selling clothes and bicycles and working in convenience stores, security, and logistics sorting. Beijing deliveries were one stop in a long working life. There is no steadily rising career, but there is a person gradually discovering what he likes and cannot bear.

Beyond Wages, There Is the Shape of a Day

Hu takes time to explain how work is actually done. Readers follow sorting, loading, and delivery before understanding why an apparently simple task is difficult. Calling everything exhausting would blur the differences among jobs.

Payment per parcel does not mean equal effort per destination. Learning routes, contacting recipients, and waiting for handovers consume time not separately paid. One undelivered parcel can delay everything after it. A phone's delivery update compresses these complications into a short line. Hu opens the line out again.

When the book's S company wanted him to move from hourly employment to a regular position, he chose to leave. Considered only as permanent employment, the offer looks like an opportunity squandered. Within his actual work it makes more sense: the delivery-area problems were unresolved, and a changed status would not remove daily pressure. He had to judge how life would be lived, not merely accept a more stable-sounding arrangement.

He later joined Pinjun. Comparing the companies reveals the importance of management, working hours, and treatment alongside wages. These are not abstract corporate cultures. The same person changes in mood and behavior under different arrangements.

The book therefore cannot simply be summarized as dislike of labor. Hu thinks about doing things well and cares about earnings and acknowledgment. What he resists often lies elsewhere: pointless reprimands amid urgent tasks, or demands for results with shrinking room to judge reasonable methods. Work itself gradually separates from the arrangements surrounding it.

His account also complicates judgments that someone is difficult. Irritability can hurt others, but correcting attitude without asking how a job repeatedly pushes someone toward anger makes the next dispute likely. His changing temperament shifts the question beyond requiring service workers to remain endlessly patient.

Why Is He Always Leaving?

Nineteen jobs invite speculation about poor planning. Had he settled earlier, might he have advanced and earned more? Reading another person's résumé, we readily reconstruct a smoother route they supposedly could have taken.

Hu does not use later publication to make every departure look farsighted. In 2023 interviews he admits that his younger self often left because he could not deal with immediate difficulties. Sometimes he feared speaking up; sometimes relationships became intolerable. Leaving was not always wise, and certainly not an advance plan for a writing career.

This refusal to defend himself completely gives the narrator substance. He can retreat, misjudge, or understand an action only later. Readers may disagree with a choice without classifying the person as a failure. Remaining also costs something. The point at which wages cease to justify endurance differs among lives.

Another episode deserves inclusion alongside repeated departures. A Literature Daily report of a book event describes his deliberate apprenticeship at a comics studio. Among those young people, he discovered that introversion need not be a problem everywhere. He later went with friends to Beijing to try making comics, before financial reasons led him away.

By career outcome, this too could count as an unsuccessful venture. It supplied something else: people could relate differently, and another environment did not always make him the person who failed to fit. Such discoveries do not appear in wage growth, but may shape self-understanding for years.

That changes how we see brief jobs. A stop need not accumulate credentials for the next to avoid being wasted. Some teach skills, some reveal unsuitable conditions, and some leave friends. Hu preserves these different weights rather than arranging nineteen jobs as nineteen tidy lessons.

Writing Requires Looking at Himself Again

Hu did not suddenly take up a pen after courier work. He had begun writing seriously in 2009, reading fiction and participating in literary forums. An interview in Literature and Art Gazette clarifies the chronology: the public first encountered Hu the courier, but writing was not a bonus identity conferred by that occupation.

Otherwise, imagining an unpracticed person producing a book through authentic experience alone would conceal the work of language. An experience deserving record and an ability to write it well are related but different. His selection, account of his younger self, placement of work procedures, and brief appearances by other people shape the life readers see.

A Beijing News interview describes reading Salinger, Carver, and Yates in a women's clothing shop when no customers were present. In retrospect, he felt those books moved him partly by restoring a sense of his own life. Distant fictional people could suddenly illuminate a difficulty close at hand.

Reading is therefore more than evidence of self-improvement despite hard work. Praising it only that way places books on another performance chart: how tired was he, and how many pages did he still finish? Reading and writing were first things he wanted to spend time doing and ways of recognizing experience. They need not continually deliver career benefits.

When he writes the past, the narrator has gained distance from the person inside it. He can see anger, avoidance, and perhaps understand others differently. The book becomes more than accumulated complaints. But retrospective calm does not erase earlier unfairness or dictate the proper feelings of people still in similar situations.

Letting go of particular resentments belongs to his handling of his life. Turning it into an instruction that injured people should eventually release everything exceeds this individual account. We can follow how he arrived here; whether another person wants or can take the same route requires another story.

After a Book Becomes Famous

By now “courier-writer” has become inadequate. Memorable as it is, the label omits clothes-selling, comics, relationships in different places, and long years of reading and practice. A title selects the most attention-catching occupation, while reading the book may help us stop remembering only that identity.

Nor can he speak for an entire laboring population. Many jobs still leave him looking from one position. His understanding of colleagues can be partial; the life he prefers need not suit them. A personal account's value includes recognizable limits. Knowing who speaks permits sympathy and further questioning.

The opening calculation also acquires limits. During deliveries, four minutes can become income. A novel absorbed in a clothing shop or a compatible friend in the comics studio accumulates differently. Hu includes them in the same book rather than excluding what may not have helped him advance.

After reading, it may be harder to imagine the person on the telephone only through one successful or failed delivery. More valuable than surprise that a courier can be a writer is the recognition that most people we encounter have much they have never had occasion to tell us. Hu has written one account. Other lives remain too extensive for a parcel, work order, or résumé to contain.

胡安焉送快递时,给自己的时间算过价钱。按当时的收入目标和派件报酬,他得平均每四分钟送完一件。这不是公司贴在墙上的口号,是他为了判断这份工作能不能做下去,自己算出的一笔账。午饭也逐渐被算进去:吃饭花钱,等餐和用餐又占了派件时间。一顿普通的饭,因此显得比菜单上贵得多。

知道这笔账以后,再听见电话那头的人催促,感觉会有些不同。收件人说的“等一下”,从自己的生活里看,确实只是一下;可那边的人还在为后面的包裹计时。他未必不知道语气应该好一点,只是这一天下来,已经越来越难做到。

2023年由浦睿文化、湖南文艺出版社推出的《我在北京送快递》,写的便是这样的生活。不过,书名只概括了其中一部分。胡安焉在大约二十年间换过十九份工作,卖过衣服和自行车,做过便利店店员、保安、物流理货员。北京的派件经历,是这段漫长打工生活中的一站。书里没有一条不断向上的职业道路,却有一个人逐渐弄明白自己喜欢什么、受不了什么的过程。

工资之外,还有每天怎样过

胡安焉写工作的一个特点,是肯花时间交代工作究竟怎样做。读者要跟着他了解分拣、装车、派件,才会明白一份看似简单的差事为什么难。只说“辛苦”,反而容易使不同工作的困难混成一团。

拿派件来说,同样按件付钱,送到不同地方,花的工夫却不一样。熟悉路线、与收件人联系、等待交接,都在报酬之外消耗时间。一个迟迟送不出去的包裹,还会拖住后面的安排。我们在手机上看见的配送进度,把这些曲折压成了很短的一行字;胡安焉把它们重新写开,读者才知道,这一行字底下究竟塞进了多少事。

书中的S公司希望他由小时工转为正式工,他反而决定离开。单看“转正”二字,很像放弃一个难得的机会;放回他的工作经验里,却容易理解得多。原有派件区域的问题没有解决,每天的压力也不会因为身份变了就消失。他需要判断的,是接下来怎样过日子,而不仅是一项听上去更稳定的安排。

他后来去了品骏。比较两家公司的经历,可以发现,影响人是否愿意留下的,除了工资,还有管理方式、工作时间和被对待的感觉。胡安焉没有把这些差异写成抽象的企业文化。他让读者看见,同样一个人在不同地方工作,心情和对人的态度会怎样变化。

因此,这本书并不适合被概括为一个人单纯地厌恶劳动。他会琢磨怎样把事情做好,也在意收入和肯定。他抵触的常常是另外一些东西:活已经很赶,仍要应付无助于工作的训斥;需要完成任务,却越来越少有机会判断怎么完成才合理。劳动内容与围绕劳动的安排,在书里渐渐分开了。

顺着他的记述想下去,我们也会对“这人不好相处”之类评价多留一点心。一个人的急躁确实会伤到旁人,但若只纠正态度,而不问这份工作每天怎样把人推到发怒的边缘,下一次争执大概还会发生。胡安焉写出自己的变化,使问题不再只是如何要求服务者永远保持耐心。

为什么他总在离开

十九份工作,很容易让人想问:是不是太缺乏规划?假如早一点安定下来,会不会已经升职,日子也宽裕一些?我们看别人的履历,常常会替当事人寻找那条本来可以走得更顺的路。

胡安焉没有用后来出书的成绩,把这些离开全部解释成远见。他在2023年的访谈里承认,自己年轻时经常处理不了眼前的困难,只好换地方。有时他不敢开口沟通,有时受不了人际关系里的拉扯。那些离开未必高明,当然也谈不上早就为写作做好了准备。

这份不为自己辩护到底的坦白,使书里的“我”有了可信的厚度。他并不总是占理,也会退缩、误判,做完一件事后才慢慢明白其中的缘故。读者可以不同意某一次选择,却不必立刻把这个人归为失败者。毕竟,留下来也不是一项没有代价的决定。究竟忍受到哪里,工资才不值得再挣,每个人面对的账都不完全相同。

不过,频繁离开之外,还有一段经历值得放进来。《文学报》报道他的分享会时,谈到他曾主动去漫画社做学徒。与那群年轻人来往,让他发现,自己的内向并不一定处处都是问题。他后来还和朋友去北京尝试漫画创作,最终又因为经济原因离开。

假如只按职业结果来排,这段经历也可以被列入没有做成的事。但它给了他别的东西:原来人与人还能这样相处,原来换一种环境,自己不必总是那个处处不合适的人。这样的发现不会出现在工资涨幅里,却可能长久地影响他怎样理解自己。

这也改变了我们看待那些短暂工作的方式。不是每一站都要替下一站积累资历,才算没有白过。有些地方让人学会一门手艺,有些让人知道自己不适合什么,也有些留下了难得的朋友。胡安焉的叙述愿意保留这些不同的分量,没有把十九份工作整齐地排成十九次教训。

写下来以后,他也得重新看自己

胡安焉并非送完快递才忽然拿起笔。早在2009年,他就开始认真写作,读小说,参与文学论坛。《文艺报》的访谈特别澄清了这件事:公众先认识“快递员胡安焉”,不等于写作是这个职业后来附赠给他的身份。

这个先后顺序很重要。若把他想成一个未经练习、只凭真实经历就写成一本书的人,我们会漏掉文字背后的工夫。经历值得记录,与能够把经历写好,是两件有关联却不相同的事。他关注什么,怎样叙述当年的自己,哪里交代工作流程,哪里让一个人短暂出场,都会影响读者最后看见怎样的生活。

新京报的一次专访谈到了他在女装店读小说的日子。没有顾客时,他读塞林格、卡佛、耶茨。后来回想,他觉得那些作品打动自己,也因为它们使自己的生活重新变得可感。小说里的人离得很远,读到某一处,却会突然照见眼前说不清楚的困惑。

所以,阅读在这里不只是“辛苦工作之余仍然上进”的证明。如果总用上进来赞美它,又会把书放回一张考核表:这个人有多疲惫,竟然还读了多少页。对胡安焉而言,读和写首先是他愿意花时间做的事,也是他辨认自身经验的办法。它们不必每次都带来职业上的好处。

而当他回头写过去,叙述者已经与当年身处其中的人有了距离。他可以看见自己如何恼怒、如何躲避,也有可能重新理解别人。这使全书不只是投诉的累积。可是,回望的平和并不意味着当年的不公已经消失,更不能替仍在类似处境里的人规定应有的心情。

胡安焉愿意放下某些怨恨,是他处理自己生活的结果。读者若把它抽成“受委屈的人最终都该释怀”,反而走出了这本个人记述能够支持的范围。值得读的,是他怎样走到这里;至于另一个人是否愿意、能否这样走,还需要听另一个人的叙述。

一本书出名以后

书写到这里,“快递员作家”这个称呼已经有些不够用了。它能让人很快记住胡安焉,却省略了卖衣服、做漫画、在不同地方与人来往的那些年,也省略了他长期的阅读和练习。一本书以最容易引起注意的经历命名,读进去以后,读者反而有机会不再只记得那个身份。

同样,他也无法替整个劳动群体说完所有的话。一个人做过很多工作,仍然只能从自己的位置看出去。他对同事的理解可能有偏差,他喜欢的生活也不一定适合同事。个人记述的可贵,正包括这些可以辨认的限度:读者知道是谁在说话,因而能够同情,也能够追问。

从这个角度再读开头那笔时间账,也会发现它的限度。派件时,四分钟可以折算成收入;可在女装店读进心里的小说、漫画社里合得来的朋友,并不按同一种办法积累。胡安焉把这些写进同一本书,没有因为它们未必帮助他升职,就从工作经历中删掉。

读过这本书,或许很难再像以前那样,只从一次派件是否顺利来想象电话另一端的人。不过,比“原来快递员中也有作家”更值得留下的认识,可能是:我们日常遇见的大多数人,都还有很多没有机会说起的事。胡安焉把其中一份写出来了。其余的人,仍在过着不能从一件包裹、一份工单或一段履历里看完的生活。

胡安焉送快遞時,給自己的時間算過價錢。按當時的收入目標和派件報酬,他得平均每四分鐘送完一件。這不是公司貼在牆上的口號,是他為了判斷這份工作能不能做下去,自己算出的一筆賬。午飯也逐漸被算進去:吃飯花錢,等餐和用餐又佔了派件時間。一頓普通的飯,因此顯得比菜單上貴得多。

知道這筆賬以後,再聽見電話那頭的人催促,感覺會有些不同。收件人說的「等一下」,從自己的生活裡看,確實只是一下;可那邊的人還在為後面的包裹計時。他未必不知道語氣應該好一點,只是這一天下來,已經越來越難做到。

2023年由浦睿文化、湖南文藝出版社推出的《我在北京送快遞》,寫的便是這樣的生活。不過,書名只概括了其中一部分。胡安焉在大約二十年間換過十九份工作,賣過衣服和自行車,做過便利店店員、保安、物流理貨員。北京的派件經歷,是這段漫長打工生活中的一站。書裡沒有一條不斷向上的職業道路,卻有一個人逐漸弄明白自己喜歡什麼、受不了什麼的過程。

工資之外,還有每天怎樣過

胡安焉寫工作的一個特點,是肯花時間交代工作究竟怎樣做。讀者要跟著他瞭解分揀、裝車、派件,才會明白一份看似簡單的差事為什麼難。只說「辛苦」,反而容易使不同工作的困難混成一團。

拿派件來說,同樣按件付錢,送到不同地方,花的工夫卻不一樣。熟悉路線、與收件人聯繫、等待交接,都在報酬之外消耗時間。一個遲遲送不出去的包裹,還會拖住後面的安排。我們在手機上看見的配送進度,把這些曲折壓成了很短的一行字;胡安焉把它們重新寫開,讀者才知道,這一行字底下究竟塞進了多少事。

書中的S公司希望他由小時工轉為正式工,他反而決定離開。單看「轉正」二字,很像放棄一個難得的機會;放回他的工作經驗裡,卻容易理解得多。原有派件區域的問題沒有解決,每天的壓力也不會因為身份變了就消失。他需要判斷的,是接下來怎樣過日子,而不僅是一項聽上去更穩定的安排。

他後來去了品駿。比較兩家公司的經歷,可以發現,影響人是否願意留下的,除了工資,還有管理方式、工作時間和被對待的感覺。胡安焉沒有把這些差異寫成抽象的企業文化。他讓讀者看見,同樣一個人在不同地方工作,心情和對人的態度會怎樣變化。

因此,這本書並不適合被概括為一個人單純地厭惡勞動。他會琢磨怎樣把事情做好,也在意收入和肯定。他抵觸的常常是另外一些東西:活已經很趕,仍要應付無助於工作的訓斥;需要完成任務,卻越來越少有機會判斷怎麼完成才合理。勞動內容與圍繞勞動的安排,在書裡漸漸分開了。

順著他的記述想下去,我們也會對「這人不好相處」之類評價多留一點心。一個人的急躁確實會傷到旁人,但若只糾正態度,而不問這份工作每天怎樣把人推到發怒的邊緣,下一次爭執大概還會發生。胡安焉寫出自己的變化,使問題不再只是如何要求服務者永遠保持耐心。

為什麼他總在離開

十九份工作,很容易讓人想問:是不是太缺乏規劃?假如早一點安定下來,會不會已經升職,日子也寬裕一些?我們看別人的履歷,常常會替當事人尋找那條本來可以走得更順的路。

胡安焉沒有用後來出書的成績,把這些離開全部解釋成遠見。他在2023年的訪談裡承認,自己年輕時經常處理不了眼前的困難,只好換地方。有時他不敢開口溝通,有時受不了人際關係裡的拉扯。那些離開未必高明,當然也談不上早就為寫作做好了準備。

這份不為自己辯護到底的坦白,使書裡的「我」有了可信的厚度。他並不總是佔理,也會退縮、誤判,做完一件事後才慢慢明白其中的緣故。讀者可以不同意某一次選擇,卻不必立刻把這個人歸為失敗者。畢竟,留下來也不是一項沒有代價的決定。究竟忍受到哪裡,工資才不值得再掙,每個人面對的賬都不完全相同。

不過,頻繁離開之外,還有一段經歷值得放進來。《文學報》報道他的分享會時,談到他曾主動去漫畫社做學徒。與那群年輕人來往,讓他發現,自己的內向並不一定處處都是問題。他後來還和朋友去北京嘗試漫畫創作,最終又因為經濟原因離開。

假如只按職業結果來排,這段經歷也可以被列入沒有做成的事。但它給了他別的東西:原來人與人還能這樣相處,原來換一種環境,自己不必總是那個處處不合適的人。這樣的發現不會出現在工資漲幅裡,卻可能長久地影響他怎樣理解自己。

這也改變了我們看待那些短暫工作的方式。不是每一站都要替下一站積累資歷,才算沒有白過。有些地方讓人學會一門手藝,有些讓人知道自己不適合什麼,也有些留下了難得的朋友。胡安焉的敘述願意保留這些不同的分量,沒有把十九份工作整齊地排成十九次教訓。

寫下來以後,他也得重新看自己

胡安焉並非送完快遞才忽然拿起筆。早在2009年,他就開始認真寫作,讀小說,參與文學論壇。《文藝報》的訪談特別澄清了這件事:公眾先認識「快遞員胡安焉」,不等於寫作是這個職業後來附贈給他的身份。

這個先後順序很重要。若把他想成一個未經練習、只憑真實經歷就寫成一本書的人,我們會漏掉文字背後的工夫。經歷值得記錄,與能夠把經歷寫好,是兩件有關聯卻不相同的事。他關注什麼,怎樣敘述當年的自己,哪裡交代工作流程,哪裡讓一個人短暫出場,都會影響讀者最後看見怎樣的生活。

新京報的一次專訪談到了他在女裝店讀小說的日子。沒有顧客時,他讀塞林格、卡佛、耶茨。後來回想,他覺得那些作品打動自己,也因為它們使自己的生活重新變得可感。小說裡的人離得很遠,讀到某一處,卻會突然照見眼前說不清楚的困惑。

所以,閱讀在這裡不只是「辛苦工作之余仍然上進」的證明。如果總用上進來贊美它,又會把書放回一張考核表:這個人有多疲憊,竟然還讀了多少頁。對胡安焉而言,讀和寫首先是他願意花時間做的事,也是他辨認自身經驗的辦法。它們不必每次都帶來職業上的好處。

而當他回頭寫過去,敘述者已經與當年身處其中的人有了距離。他可以看見自己如何惱怒、如何躲避,也有可能重新理解別人。這使全書不只是投訴的累積。可是,回望的平和並不意味著當年的不公已經消失,更不能替仍在類似處境裡的人規定應有的心情。

胡安焉願意放下某些怨恨,是他處理自己生活的結果。讀者若把它抽成「受委屈的人最終都該釋懷」,反而走出了這本個人記述能夠支持的範圍。值得讀的,是他怎樣走到這裡;至於另一個人是否願意、能否這樣走,還需要聽另一個人的敘述。

一本書出名以後

書寫到這裡,「快遞員作家」這個稱呼已經有些不夠用了。它能讓人很快記住胡安焉,卻省略了賣衣服、做漫畫、在不同地方與人來往的那些年,也省略了他長期的閱讀和練習。一本書以最容易引起注意的經歷命名,讀進去以後,讀者反而有機會不再只記得那個身份。

同樣,他也無法替整個勞動群體說完所有的話。一個人做過很多工作,仍然只能從自己的位置看出去。他對同事的理解可能有偏差,他喜歡的生活也不一定適合同事。個人記述的可貴,正包括這些可以辨認的限度:讀者知道是誰在說話,因而能夠同情,也能夠追問。

從這個角度再讀開頭那筆時間賬,也會發現它的限度。派件時,四分鐘可以折算成收入;可在女裝店讀進心裡的小說、漫畫社裡合得來的朋友,並不按同一種辦法積累。胡安焉把這些寫進同一本書,沒有因為它們未必幫助他升職,就從工作經歷中刪掉。

讀過這本書,或許很難再像以前那樣,只從一次派件是否順利來想象電話另一端的人。不過,比「原來快遞員中也有作家」更值得留下的認識,可能是:我們日常遇見的大多數人,都還有很多沒有機會說起的事。胡安焉把其中一份寫出來了。其餘的人,仍在過著不能從一件包裹、一份工單或一段履歷裡看完的生活。

Sources & further reading出处与延伸阅读出處與延伸閱讀

Read public interviews and reports, their short original quotations, and Chinese reader reviews; not the whole book. No substantive Amazon or Goodreads reviews were obtained. The four-minute calculation is the author's historical personal account, not a current industry rule.

已读公开访谈、报道及所引原书短段、中文读者评论,未通读全书;没有取得Amazon或Goodreads实质评论。四分钟账为作者个人当年的计算,不是当今行业统一规定。

已讀公開訪談、報道及所引原書短段、中文讀者評論,未通讀全書;沒有取得Amazon或Goodreads實質評論。四分鐘賬為作者個人當年的計算,不是當今行業統一規定。

Follow the links for the original passages and fuller discussions. Distinguish the author’s account, later research, and this introduction’s own questions.

外链提供原作段落与更完整的讨论。阅读时请区分作者的叙述、后来的研究,以及本文继续提出的问题。

外鏈提供原作段落與更完整的討論。閱讀時請區分作者的敘述、後來的研究,以及本文繼續提出的問題。

Author conversation作者访谈作者訪談

Jiang Yuting — author interview, 2023 ↗

Read relevant answers on time, meals, and leaving jobs; inconsistent dates and place names not adopted.

已读时间、午饭与离职相关回答,不采用相互冲突日期或地名。

已讀時間、午飯與離職相關回答,不採用相互衝突日期或地名。

Author conversation作者访谈作者訪談

Beijing News — Hu Anyan interview ↗

Read passages on reading in a clothing shop and writing from 2009.

已读女装店阅读与2009开始写作相关段落。

已讀女裝店閱讀與2009開始寫作相關段落。

Author conversation作者访谈作者訪談

Literature and Art Gazette — interview ↗

Writing preceded courier work; the limits of an individual account.

写作早于快递工作,以及个人记述的范围。

寫作早於快遞工作,以及個人記述的範圍。

Read the original阅读原作閱讀原作

Douban — quoted original passage ↗

Only search-returned text on employment status and delivery area; no invented dialogue.

仅检索返回转正和派件区域相关原书短段,不扩写对白。

僅檢索返回轉正和派件區域相關原書短段,不擴寫對白。

Research & discussion研究与讨论研究與討論

Literature Daily — book-event report ↗

The comics apprenticeship and its effect on self-understanding are attributed to this report.

漫画社学徒经历与自我理解明确归此分享会报道。

漫畫社學徒經歷與自我理解明確歸此分享會報道。

Institutional sources机构资料機構資料

CiNii — publication record ↗

Chinese title, publisher, and ISBN; first publication in 2023.

核对中文题名、出版机构与ISBN,初版2023。

核對中文題名、出版機構與ISBN,初版2023。