Non DubitoA Mind in Many Languages
Search搜索搜尋
EN

The Zhuangzi, Reopened大知解庄子大知解莊子

The Old Man Catching Cicadas

他捕蝉像捡东西一样——佝偻承蜩

他捕蟬像撿東西一樣——佝僂承蜩

The Old Man Catching Cicadas. A reader essay in The Zhuangzi, Reopened: stories, relationships, and the space left for another person.

他捕蝉像捡东西一样——佝偻承蜩。从故事与细节出发,重新看见人与人之间留给彼此的空间。

他捕蟬像撿東西一樣——佝僂承蜩。從故事與細節出發,重新看見人與人之間留給彼此的空間。

As though picking something up

Watching a skilled person can make an activity seem easier than it is. A musical phrase passes without apparent strain. A tool reaches exactly the right place. The movement looks so ordinary that we forget anything had to be learned.

Confucius encounters an elderly man with a curved back catching cicadas in a wood. He does it as though simply picking them up. Confucius asks whether there is a way behind such skill. The man says there is, and begins to explain.

Over the next essays, I want to bring several craft stories in “Understanding Life” into conversation. This is a reading route, not a claim that the chapter arranges them consecutively as five lessons. The cicada catcher is a useful beginning because he offers more than an astonishing result. He tells us something about getting there.

Small balls on a pole

He starts with balancing small balls. The older commentary places them at the end of the pole. Two, then three, then five: increasing steadiness in the exercise accompanies increasing ease in catching cicadas, until the action resembles picking them up.

The opening reference to five or six months has been read as a period of practice; an older gloss instead takes it as the season for catching cicadas. Here I follow the practice reading without turning the duration into a guarantee. The references to small quantities and one miss in ten give the account a sense of progression. They are not a modern training dataset from which we can calculate a schedule for everyone.

What attracts me is the movement from an impressive ability to a small, visible task. The old man does not merely say, “Concentrate.” There is something his hands can attempt and his eyes can check. A falling ball provides a kind of answer that does not depend wholly on his estimate of how well he is doing.

The exercise is not unrelated to catching cicadas. Holding a pole steadily belongs to the larger activity. Practicing a component can help the whole, without eliminating the need to meet the actual object or learn the judgments a real situation demands.

A living body, not a block of wood

The man says that his body is like a tree stump and his arm like a withered branch. The images are so still that we almost forget a living body is holding the pole.

They do not provide instructions to freeze every muscle or hold a painful posture. We are being shown steadiness, not given a technical account of its physiology. Nor can we conclude that he no longer aims. He immediately identifies the cicada’s wings as the object of his awareness.

He speaks of the vastness of heaven and earth and the multitude of things, yet at this moment knows only those wings. The world has not ceased to exist. His attention is not being repeatedly pulled away from the particular thing he is doing.

Sometimes a task comes with several additional tasks of our own making. We perform the action, monitor whether we look competent, imagine the spectator’s opinion, and rehearse an explanation for possible failure. One job in the hands becomes several meetings in the mind. The old man suggests the possibility of letting a few of those meetings end.

Concentration need not mean more force

Confucius turns to his students and speaks of an undivided purpose gathering into extraordinary attentiveness. Concentration is therefore not a mistaken description of the scene. There is no need to reject the word in order to notice a different way of approaching it.

Attention may be helped not only by commanding ourselves to try harder, but by reducing interruptions, setting aside matters that need not be settled now, and making the immediate task clearer. Adding practice and subtracting distraction can work together.

Subtraction is not a payment made once, after which attention costs nothing. Messages return, fatigue develops, and concerns come back. Having to return to an activity does not prove that earlier steadiness was false. If we make permanent freedom from distraction the requirement, every wandering thought acquires an additional burden of shame.

We can understand the tree-stump image without aspiring to have no needs. Resting when tired may be part of preserving the capacity to attend well on another occasion. The story’s stillness is not a command to become inanimate.

Not exchanging the wings for everything else

The old man says he does not turn aside or exchange the cicada’s wings for the multitude of things. What interests me is not a verdict that everything else is bad. It is his refusal to switch in the middle of this particular act.

Distractions are not always trivial. Suppose you have promised to read a book with a child and a message arrives. It may concern something genuinely worthwhile. That is precisely what makes the decision difficult: two things matter, but the same stretch of time cannot be given wholly to both.

You can check whether the message is urgent. If it is not, it may wait until the page is finished. That is not indifference to its sender. It is honoring the small period of attention already offered to someone present.

This is our contemporary illustration, not a hierarchy of relationships prescribed by the cicada catcher. An emergency or someone in immediate need may require interruption. Making the “wings” an absolute center that nothing may displace could turn admirable attention into disregard for other lives.

The useful commitment is more modest: while doing this, try to be here. If the situation changes, remain able to recognize that something else should now be done. Choosing is not the same as forbidding oneself ever to notice a new circumstance.

Find the part you can practice

One practical invitation in the story is to make a vague ambition more workable. “I want to speak well” or “I want to stay steady” does not yet tell us what to do tomorrow.

For a presentation, one possibility is to rehearse the opening two minutes, listen back, and notice where the explanation wanders or assumes missing information. Another is to ask an unfamiliar listener to describe what they understood. A confused response may point to a passage worth changing, rather than proving that the speaker is hopeless at communicating.

These are examples inspired by the form of the old man’s practice, not methods established by the ancient anecdote. The question is whether a smaller task can provide useful feedback. Nor must all feedback be numerical. A clearer restatement or a precise account of what was confusing can be valuable without becoming a score.

Catching cicadas itself can also be practiced. Real tasks are not necessarily beyond training while only substitutes are trainable. We need to move between a component exercise and the larger activity, checking whether something learned in one actually helps in the other.

The point of a manageable exercise is to return us to the work, not give us an indefinitely measurable way of avoiding it.

A teacher in the wood

The old man has a curved back. Confucius nevertheless asks him a question and carries the answer to his students. I like the redistribution of authority in that scene. A person need not occupy the recognized position of teacher to have something to teach. Appearance does not settle what somebody can do.

We do not need to praise him by declaring his body inferior or assuming it must disadvantage him in every part of the activity. The text supplies no such comparison. Still less should we require every person with a bodily limitation to perform an extraordinary feat in order to deserve respect.

He is this particular person, with this particular skill. His experience is worth hearing without becoming a universal solution or a duty to represent everyone who looks like him.

What remains after the scene is not only the nearly magical catch. It is the small balls, the steadied body, and a little attention left for a pair of wings amid a very large world.

When the next task refuses to go well, harsher self-command may not be the only beginning. Perhaps the task can become smaller, an interruption can wait, and one movement can become visible enough to revise. Let the hands discover somewhere to start.

一、像伸手拾起一样

有些人的手艺,会使旁观者误以为事情本来就很容易。一段曲子顺顺当当地过去,一块木头被削成合适的形状,一个小动作正好落在它该落的地方。看得久了,我们会忘记,眼前这份从容曾经需要准备。孔子在楚地的树林中,看见一个佝偻的老人捕蝉。“犹掇之也”,像拾东西一样。他问,您这样灵巧,有什么门道吗?老人答,有。

接下来几篇,我想把《达生》中的几个技艺故事连起来读。这是我们的阅读路线,不是声称原书把它们紧挨着排成五节课。先从这位老人开始,因为他没有只留下一个令人惊叹的结果。他肯讲,自己怎样来到这里。

二、竿头的丸子

老人先说“累丸”:把小丸叠起来,不使它们掉落。旧注解释为在竿头累丸。两个、三个、五个,随着叠丸的稳定,捕蝉也越来越从容,最后回到开头那个“犹掇之也”。

五六月累丸二而不坠,……累五而不坠,犹掇之也。

“五六月”有读作练习五六个月的,也有旧注解作黏蝉的时节;本文沿练习时日来理解。不必据此承诺,人人练满同样的月份就会得到同样的手艺。中间还有“锱铢”“十一”这样的说法,它们给故事一种逐渐纯熟的感觉,却不是一张已经测量、可以拿来照算的现代训练表。我喜欢的是,老人没有只说“你要专心”。他给出一个手可以做、眼可以检查的小任务。丸子落下,就知道刚才的稳定还不够。那是一个让练习不必全靠自我感觉的办法。

可它也不是与捕蝉毫无关系的替身。持竿的稳定,正与捕捉时的动作有关。单练一个部分,能够帮整体的忙;它不能保证以后不用接触真正的对象,也不能代替一切现场判断。

三、身体没有消失

老人接着说,他安置身体如树桩,执臂如枯枝。这两个比喻很静,静得让人几乎忘记,竿子仍由活人的身体握着。故事没有要求把身体冻住,也没有说只要绷得足够紧,就可以复制这一幕。我们能读到的是动作的安定,而不是一份肌肉如何用力的技术说明。更不能从中推出“他不用瞄准”:他后面明明说,自己所知的只有蝉翼。

虽天地之大,万物之多,而唯蜩翼之知。

天地很大,眼前却有一处具体的落点。不是世界真的消失了,而是在这一刻,他不被别的东西不断拉走。身体和注意力一起留在正在做的事情上。我们有时一边干活,一边监视自己干得够不够好,还要猜旁边的人是否觉得自己笨。手上原本只有一个任务,心里却开了好几场会。老人让人想到另一种可能:先让其中几场会散了,手才有机会把眼前这件事做完。

四、专注也可以从少一点开始

孔子回头对弟子说:“用志不分,乃凝于神。”这本来就在讲心志不分散。因此,不必把“专注”说成错误答案,再另造一条完全相反的路。我想补的是,专注未必只能靠持续命令自己“再集中一点”。减少打断、收好不必此刻处理的事情、给动作一个明确落点,也可以是在帮助专注。加一点训练,减一点牵扯,两者可以一起发生。

但减法不会一次付清,从此永远轻松。消息会再来,身体会累,挂心的事也可能重新出现。注意力走开以后把它带回来,并不证明前面的工夫是假。把“不分心”变成永远不能失败的指标,只会给分心再加一份羞耻。老人用树桩和枯枝说自己的状态,我们可以理解那份稳定,不必逼自己变成没有需要的木头。需要休息的时候,停下来,也可能是在保住下一次认真做事的能力。

五、不拿万物来换这对翅膀

吾不反不侧,不以万物易蜩之翼,何为而不得!

这句话最打动我的,不是老人宣布其他东西都不好,而是他不在此刻换过去。天地万物仍在那里;有些东西甚至很值得关心,但不必同时挤进这一次动作。比如你答应陪孩子看完一本书,读到一半,手机亮了。那条消息也许真的重要,未必是无聊诱惑。难处恰恰在这里:两个都值得,时间却只有同一段。你可以先判断是否急迫;若不急,就让它等到这一页读完。不是不重视别人,而是兑现眼前这一小段相处。

这是我们带进来的日常例子,不是捕蝉老人替所有关系排好了优先级。遇到危险、需要立即照顾的人,当然可能必须中断。把“蝉翼”奉为不可更改的中心,也可能把专注变成对其他生命的冷漠。所以我愿意保留的是选择的清醒:现在做这件事,就尽量真的在这里;情况变了,也能承认该换一件事。不是一旦决定,就再也不准看见别的。

六、练得到的那一点

故事对今天很实用的一处,是提醒我们把模糊的愿望拆成可以着手的部分。“我要讲得好”“我要更稳”,通常还不足以告诉人明天怎样练。如果准备一次介绍,可以先练开头两分钟,录下来听听哪里绕、哪里漏了必要背景;也可以请一个不熟悉主题的人复述刚才听到的意思。若对方没听明白,先改那一小段,不必把整个人判成不会讲话。

这些不是“累五丸”已经证明有效的通用训练法,只是借它的形状来想:有没有一个规模较小、能得到反馈的练习?也不必把所有进步都化成数字。一次更准确的复述、一次能说清哪里不明白的反馈,同样可能有用。捕蝉本身也可以练,临场应对也可以通过合适的演练来准备。不是只有替身任务能训练,而实事只能碰运气。小练习与实际任务之间,需要来回走,看看练到的东西有没有真的带过去。

七、树林里的老师

老人身体佝偻,孔子却向他请教,又把听到的话带给弟子。这个安排让人高兴:可以教人的,不一定站在被授予老师身份的位置上;身体的外观,也不能替一个人的本领下结论。但我们不必为了赞美老人,再说他身体“不如人”,或保证这样的身体在每个动作上都比别人吃亏。故事没有给出那份比较。更不能要求每个有身体限制的人,都用惊人的成绩证明自己值得尊重。

他首先是这个具体的人,有这个具体的本领。他的经验值得听,并不因为它能替全天下的人解决问题;也不因为他必须代表谁。故事最后留下的,不只是一次近乎神奇的捕捉。还有竿头的小丸、能安定下来的身体,以及在那么大的天地间暂时留给蝉翼的一点心神。下次觉得自己怎么也做不好一件事,未必先要更用力地责备自己。也许可以把任务放小一点,把干扰挪开一点,找到那个能看见、能修正的小动作。

比如只把那段开头重讲一遍,让一个人听明白;明天再接后面。不需要先拥有老人最后的从容,才有资格拿起今天这根还不太稳的竿子。先让手知道,今天可以从哪里开始。

一、像伸手拾起一樣

有些人的手藝,會使旁觀者誤以為事情本來就很容易。一段曲子順順當當地過去,一塊木頭被削成合適的形狀,一個小動作正好落在它該落的地方。看得久了,我們會忘記,眼前這份從容曾經需要準備。孔子在楚地的樹林中,看見一個佝僂的老人捕蟬。「猶掇之也」,像拾東西一樣。他問,您這樣靈巧,有什麼門道嗎?老人答,有。

接下來幾篇,我想把《達生》中的幾個技藝故事連起來讀。這是我們的閱讀路線,不是聲稱原書把它們緊挨著排成五節課。先從這位老人開始,因為他沒有只留下一個令人驚嘆的結果。他肯講,自己怎樣來到這裡。

二、竿頭的丸子

老人先說「累丸」:把小丸疊起來,不使它們掉落。舊註解釋為在竿頭累丸。兩個、三個、五個,隨著疊丸的穩定,捕蟬也越來越從容,最後回到開頭那個「猶掇之也」。

五六月累丸二而不墜,……累五而不墜,猶掇之也。

「五六月」有讀作練習五六個月的,也有舊註解作黏蟬的時節;本文沿練習時日來理解。不必據此承諾,人人練滿同樣的月份就會得到同樣的手藝。中間還有「錙銖」「十一」這樣的說法,它們給故事一種逐漸純熟的感覺,卻不是一張已經測量、可以拿來照算的現代訓練表。我喜歡的是,老人沒有只說「你要專心」。他給出一個手可以做、眼可以檢查的小任務。丸子落下,就知道剛才的穩定還不夠。那是一個讓練習不必全靠自我感覺的辦法。

可它也不是與捕蟬毫無關係的替身。持竿的穩定,正與捕捉時的動作有關。單練一個部分,能夠幫整體的忙;它不能保證以後不用接觸真正的對象,也不能代替一切現場判斷。

三、身體沒有消失

老人接著說,他安置身體如樹樁,執臂如枯枝。這兩個比喻很靜,靜得讓人幾乎忘記,竿子仍由活人的身體握著。故事沒有要求把身體凍住,也沒有說只要繃得足夠緊,就可以複製這一幕。我們能讀到的是動作的安定,而不是一份肌肉如何用力的技術說明。更不能從中推出「他不用瞄準」:他後面明明說,自己所知的只有蟬翼。

雖天地之大,萬物之多,而唯蜩翼之知。

天地很大,眼前卻有一處具體的落點。不是世界真的消失了,而是在這一刻,他不被別的東西不斷拉走。身體和注意力一起留在正在做的事情上。我們有時一邊幹活,一邊監視自己做得夠不夠好,還要猜旁邊的人是否覺得自己笨。手上原本只有一個任務,心裡卻開了好幾場會。老人讓人想到另一種可能:先讓其中幾場會散了,手才有機會把眼前這件事做完。

四、專注也可以從少一點開始

孔子回頭對弟子說:「用志不分,乃凝於神。」這本來就在講心志不分散。因此,不必把「專注」說成錯誤答案,再另造一條完全相反的路。我想補的是,專注未必只能靠持續命令自己「再集中一點」。減少打斷、收好不必此刻處理的事情、給動作一個明確落點,也可以是在幫助專注。加一點訓練,減一點牽扯,兩者可以一起發生。

但減法不會一次付清,從此永遠輕鬆。消息會再來,身體會累,掛心的事也可能重新出現。注意力走開以後把它帶回來,並不證明前面的工夫是假。把「不分心」變成永遠不能失敗的指標,只會給分心再加一份羞恥。老人用樹樁和枯枝說自己的狀態,我們可以理解那份穩定,不必逼自己變成沒有需要的木頭。需要休息的時候,停下來,也可能是在保住下一次認真做事的能力。

五、不拿萬物來換這對翅膀

吾不反不側,不以萬物易蜩之翼,何為而不得!

這句話最打動我的,不是老人宣佈其他東西都不好,而是他不在此刻換過去。天地萬物仍在那裡;有些東西甚至很值得關心,但不必同時擠進這一次動作。比如你答應陪孩子看完一本書,讀到一半,手機亮了。那條消息也許真的重要,未必是無聊誘惑。難處恰恰在這裡:兩個都值得,時間卻只有同一段。你可以先判斷是否急迫;若不急,就讓它等到這一頁讀完。不是不重視別人,而是兌現眼前這一小段相處。

這是我們帶進來的日常例子,不是捕蟬老人替所有關係排好了優先級。遇到危險、需要立即照顧的人,當然可能必須中斷。把「蟬翼」奉為不可更改的中心,也可能把專注變成對其他生命的冷漠。所以我願意保留的是選擇的清醒:現在做這件事,就盡量真的在這裡;情況變了,也能承認該換一件事。不是一旦決定,就再也不准看見別的。

六、練得到的那一點

故事對今天很實用的一處,是提醒我們把模糊的願望拆成可以著手的部分。「我要講得好」「我要更穩」,通常還不足以告訴人明天怎樣練。如果準備一次介紹,可以先練開頭兩分鐘,錄下來聽聽哪裡繞、哪裡漏了必要背景;也可以請一個不熟悉主題的人複述剛才聽到的意思。若對方沒聽明白,先改那一小段,不必把整個人判成不會講話。

這些不是「累五丸」已經證明有效的通用訓練法,只是借它的形狀來想:有沒有一個規模較小、能得到回饋的練習?也不必把所有進步都化成數字。一次更準確的複述、一次能說清哪裡不明白的回饋,同樣可能有用。捕蟬本身也可以練,臨場應對也可以通過合適的演練來準備。不是只有替身任務能訓練,而實事只能碰運氣。小練習與實際任務之間,需要來回走,看看練到的東西有沒有真的帶過去。

七、樹林裡的老師

老人身體佝僂,孔子卻向他請教,又把聽到的話帶給弟子。這個安排讓人高興:可以教人的,不一定站在被授予老師身分的位置上;身體的外觀,也不能替一個人的本領下結論。但我們不必為了讚美老人,再說他身體「不如人」,或保證這樣的身體在每個動作上都比別人吃虧。故事沒有給出那份比較。更不能要求每個有身體限制的人,都用驚人的成績證明自己值得尊重。

他首先是這個具體的人,有這個具體的本領。他的經驗值得聽,並不因為它能替全天下的人解決問題;也不因為他必須代表誰。故事最後留下的,不只是一次近乎神奇的捕捉。還有竿頭的小丸、能安定下來的身體,以及在那麼大的天地間暫時留給蟬翼的一點心神。下次覺得自己怎麼也做不好一件事,未必先要更用力地責備自己。也許可以把任務放小一點,把干擾挪開一點,找到那個能看見、能修正的小動作。

比如只把那段開頭重講一遍,讓一個人聽明白;明天再接後面。不需要先擁有老人最後的從容,才有資格拿起今天這根還不太穩的竿子。先讓手知道,今天可以從哪裡開始。