Non DubitoA Mind in Many Languages
Search搜索搜尋
EN

Structures in Drama戏剧里的结构戲劇裡的結構 · 14 / 23

Barbara Takes Off Her Badge: What Does the Donation Settle?

巴巴拉摘下徽章:救济所得救了,捐款人的账也结清了吗

巴巴拉摘下徽章:救濟所得救了,捐款人的賬也結清了嗎

Major Barbara · George Bernard Shaw

巴巴拉少校 · 乔治·萧伯纳

巴巴拉少校 · 喬治·蕭伯納

The money will keep people fed and sheltered. Barbara's difficulty is what else she is being asked to celebrate when the check arrives.

钱能让救济所继续开门,这一点谁也无法抹去。但感谢这笔帮助,是否就得一并接受出钱者想讲的故事?

錢能讓救濟所繼續開門,這一點誰也無法抹去。但感謝這筆幫助,是否就得一並接受出錢者想講的故事?

Han Qin (秦汉秦汉秦漢) ·

These readings discuss key scenes and endings. They read the plays, not particular stage or screen productions.

本系列涉及关键剧情与结局,阅读对象是剧本文本,而非某一场舞台演出或影视改编。

本系列涉及關鍵劇情與結局,閱讀對象是劇本文本,而非某一場舞台演出或影視改編。

Undershaft has brought his own fountain pen. There will be no delay while someone searches for one. The five thousand pounds they have been struggling to find can be made available at the table in a few strokes. Mrs Baines has already thanked God and wants the check for the afternoon meeting. Barbara's fiancé gives up his place. Everyone watches the pen—until Barbara tells her father to stop.

She knows exactly how badly the money is needed. Major is her rank in the Salvation Army; the people she meets need meals, shelter and jobs. Moments earlier she was urging her fiancé to write an appeal to the newspapers. The collections taken in hats yield pennies when the work needs thousands. She hates discovering that, while she sings a hymn, she is thinking about the amount the next verse might bring in. Keeping the doors open has begun to consume the energy she hoped to give the people coming through them.

So she initially cheers when Mrs Baines announces a gift of five thousand pounds. It is conditional: five other donors must provide a thousand each. Then Undershaft identifies the benefactor behind the aristocratic title. The money comes from Bodger's liquor business. The changed name brings the announcement back to people Barbara knows: drinkers struggling to escape an appetite that advertising helps cultivate. Now the business's success is to enter the story of their relief.

Barbara would welcome Bodger himself, if he came willing to face his life and change it. What troubles her is the possibility that the check can make the journey in his place. His contribution arrives, the consequences of his trade remain, and she is expected to find a new language for something she opposed yesterday. The money's usefulness makes gratitude more difficult, not less. She cannot dismiss it as an empty gesture.

Her father will supply the entire matching sum. He manufactures weapons and does not conceal it. Earlier he told her fiancé that he could buy the Army. This is more than a hostile interpretation imposed on a generous donor. He is testing something in front of his daughter. He need not acquire legal ownership of the organization to influence how it welcomes him or explains what he represents.

Mrs Baines has an answer Barbara cannot easily escape. If the shelter closes, will the people outside drink less or more? Money from liquor can be put to work against the consequences of liquor. She has not declared the trade harmless. She is responsible for keeping assistance available. A morally unimpeachable refusal inside the building will not make anyone at the door less hungry.

This is a real objection, not a device for making Barbara's principles look foolish. The money can buy food. It can keep people housed. Suspicion about its source does not abolish those uses. But solving those problems need not settle every question about the giver. The two women serve the same people, yet the situation increasingly demands that one surrender what she values most in order for the other to keep working.

Bill Walker is nearby, waiting for Barbara's response. After striking Jenny and an older woman, he returned with a sovereign, hoping payment would finish the matter. Jenny refused it for herself and suggested compensating the older woman. He would not. When a donation to the Army was proposed, Barbara wanted his soul, not his coin. He threw the money onto a drum. The large check now gives him an obvious taunt: perhaps salvation can be bought after all; his offer was merely too small.

Compensating an injured person, stopping the violence and asking for conversion are not identical demands. Barbara's own way of dealing with Bill has bound them together. The celebration of a much larger gift makes it harder to explain where one ends and another begins. She is not standing outside the institution's contradictions, examining other people's compromises from a safe distance.

Undershaft is adept at using the discomfort. He describes the suffering his weapons cause so forcefully that Mrs Baines briefly recoils. Then he reverses the argument. If the Army promotes peace, is he not supporting work that could eventually damage his own business? Her delight returns. She sees evil being redirected toward good. He seems to enjoy the ease with which an accusation can be made to conclude in his welcome. Different convictions carry the same check across the table.

Mrs Baines's sincerity does not remove every troubling element of the appeal. She has used a poor man's reduced hostility to the wealthy as evidence of the Army's success. Undershaft immediately recognizes an advantage to employers. Relief, conversion, social peace and public gratitude are all real activities; they are also entangled. The people Barbara wants to help can become an argument about why the donation benefits its source.

Once the check is written, it acquires a procession. Undershaft is invited to the meeting, where Barbara is to announce that he has saved the Army. Her fiancé appears with a flag and trombone. Music and jokes surround the transaction. Going with them would mean more than allowing someone else to accept money. She would appear in her own rank and name as a witness to the account they are about to celebrate.

She cannot go. Mrs Baines asks tearfully whether accepting the money was wrong. Barbara kisses her and acknowledges what she must do to preserve the work. The moment frustrates a clean division between a compromised fundraiser and a pure dissenter. Barbara can recognize the other woman's responsibility without joining the procession. Understanding the pressure does not make her own distress disappear.

Then she removes the silver badge from her collar and calls her father over. When he realizes that she means to pin it on him, he retreats. She follows, attaches it and steps back to display him. Is it not rather little to get for five thousand pounds? The man who can describe his own trade's horrors with composure becomes uneasy before this small visible return. He can no longer watch the gratitude entirely from outside it.

The gesture does not restore her certainty. She cannot pray and wants the company to leave. They reassure her that she is overworked and will recover; the music moves away while she remains in the yard. Bill continues mocking her. Neither the donation nor her refusal has made him kinder. She cannot command the afternoon back into an order she understands.

Yet the people immediately before her remain. She offers Bill her hand as he leaves, without receiving much graciousness in return, then turns to Peter Shirley, the older unemployed worker. His experience of being discarded suddenly feels closer to her own. He reminds her that she still has youth and hope. She promises to seek work for him and counts her money.

These sums have readily named uses: tea for two, a bed for Peter and her fare home. He dislikes being the object of charity. Barbara proposes sharing as friends, and asks something of him too: talk to her, keep her from crying. He may talk about books and speeches at odds with her beliefs. Agreement with her religion is not the admission price for this exchange. They go out together, each possessing something the other can use.

A little tea money cannot replace the ten thousand pounds. Nor does leaving the procession place Barbara beyond compromised wealth. In Act III she visits her father's weapons factory and imagines working among people whose meals and housing are secure—people who can reject her message without losing their bread. That subsequent choice is not proof that the arms business has become harmless. She still sees the homes and families its products can destroy.

For the moment, she has not solved those larger questions. Peter needs somewhere to sleep tonight. Her badge is on another collar, and the work no longer has its old assured name. She has a little money; he has something to say. Neither requires the other to accept an explanation of the whole world before making what is available between them available now.

安德谢夫特不必等人去取笔。他自己带着自来水笔,只要在桌边坐下,就能写出一张五千英镑的支票。刚才还需要到处筹措的钱,此刻离众人这样近。贝恩斯夫人已经感谢了上帝,又催着要把支票带到下午的大会上;巴巴拉的未婚夫让开位置,大家一时都静下来,看着他写。巴巴拉却忽然叫停。父亲停了笔,其他人转过身,像是不明白她为什么偏偏在这个时候开口。

这不是她第一次为筹款着急。她在兼做传道与救济的救世军里被称作少校,日常面对的却是没有饭吃、没有工作、需要住处的人。她刚才还催未婚夫给报纸写求助信:募款会上那一顶顶帽子收来的零钱实在不够,组织已经警告,钱再不到,救济所就可能关门。她讨厌自己唱着圣歌,却越来越惦记下一节能多收几个便士;她来这里是想帮助人改变生活,不是日日为让救济所开着门向人求告。

所以,听见贝恩斯夫人说有人愿捐五千英镑,她先是欢呼。负责人接着补上条件:还需要另外五人各捐一千,把总数凑到一万。直到父亲说出那位贵族捐款人的原名,她才知道,钱来自波杰的酒业。名字一换,原先只意味着救济可以继续的好消息,便牵回了她每天见到的人。她记得酗酒者的挣扎,也记得自己曾反对的酒类广告。现在,他的名字却要出现在这场救济的感谢里。

巴巴拉愿意让这个人亲自走到救济所,认真面对自己的生活,也愿意帮助他。她担心的是,支票来了,人的生活却不必改变。对方给了钱,她仿佛便得把过去一直反对的事重新解释一遍,好使今天的感激不至于显得矛盾。她越清楚五千英镑能够做什么,就越难把这份感谢当作一句没有后果的客套。

父亲在场,事情又更难了一层。他经营军火生意,并不打算掩饰;贝恩斯夫人缺少的另一半款项,正由他一人补齐。他早先还对巴巴拉的未婚夫说过,自己可以把救世军买下来。这是他要在女儿面前证明的本领。所谓买下,未必要成为组织的法律主人;他有把握改变的,是这个院子里的人将怎样欢迎他、怎样解释他的到来。

贝恩斯夫人有自己的反问:如果明天那些人走到门口,发现救济所已经关门,喝酒的人会更少,还是更多?她没有说酒业从此无害,而是说,拿这笔钱去帮助戒酒,正可以使它做一点与出钱者生意相反的事。她每天要使救济继续,不能只计算自己有没有说出漂亮的原则。门外的人不会因为屋里作出了无可指摘的决定,就少饿一顿。

这个反问真正为难的地方,在于巴巴拉不能假装自己没有听见。眼前的钱能买食物,能保住房屋,这些用途没有因为来源可疑就消失。可是,能解决一件真切的困难,也不该使它顺带解决出钱者的所有问题。两位女人在同一处工作,都不愿看见那些人重新流落出去;争执却越来越像,其中一个若坚持,另一个就必须放弃自己最想守住的东西。

旁边的比尔正等着看她怎样回答。此前他打了珍妮和一位老妇人,后来拿着一枚金币回来,希望交钱以后,一切到此为止。珍妮不收给自己,请他补偿老妇人,他却不肯。等钱被提议转捐组织,巴巴拉也拒绝了:她要的不是金币,而是他的灵魂。比尔终于把钱扔在鼓上,现在又看着大支票嘲弄她,原来不是钱买不到解脱,只是自己出得太少。补偿受伤的人、使他停止伤人、要求他皈依,本来就不是一件事;大支票带来的欢庆,却使巴巴拉更难说清自己究竟坚持什么。

安德谢夫特比所有人都擅长利用这种为难。他并不在女儿面前装出悔过的样子,反倒把军火生意造成的痛苦说得极重,让贝恩斯夫人一度退缩,然后忽然换一个方向:既然救世军劝人和平,自己捐钱给它,不就是支持一项最终会妨碍自己生意的工作?贝恩斯夫人重新欣喜起来。她所相信的,是恶果也能够被转成善用;他所欣赏的,却像是任何一条指责都能在最后替自己赢得欢迎。两人用不同的心思,把同一张支票交接完成。

她的诚意没有取消这场劝募中令人不安的部分。刚才,她还用穷人不再仇视有钱人的例子向他展示工作的成效,想借此得到支持;父亲则立刻看见了雇主会得到的方便。救济、传道、安抚和感谢,没有一件只是空话,却也没有天然分开。巴巴拉想救的人,正在被用来说明这笔捐款对出钱者有什么好处。她自己同样没有站在所有矛盾之外:她也为募款耗尽心力,也曾在钱与人的故事之间不断调整说法。

支票写成以后,事情没有停在账面。众人准备参加大会,邀请父亲加入行列,还希望巴巴拉亲自宣布组织因他而得救。未婚夫拿来旗帜和长号,玩笑与乐声一起涌上来。钱替救济所延续了生活,同时也开始替这一天安排一个值得公开庆祝的故事。对于巴巴拉,跟着走出去,已不只是默许别人收款;她还要带着自己的称号,替这份解释站到众人面前。

她说自己不能去。贝恩斯夫人含着泪问,是不是认为自己收钱做错了;巴巴拉却走过去吻她,让她去,也承认她为保住组织不得不这样做。眼前这个人所背负的责任,她仍然愿意看见,哪怕自己已经无法加入接下来的欢庆。体谅对方,没有使刚才的痛苦一笔勾销。

然后她摘下领口的银徽章,叫父亲过来。父亲发现她要把徽章别到自己身上,反倒往后退。她跟过去,仍把它别上,再退开,让大家看。刚才可以大谈自己赚钱方式的人,此刻却被这一件小东西弄得有些不自在。女儿问他,花五千英镑得到这么一点东西,算不算太少。刚才的捐助忽然有了一件可以给大家看的回礼。他不再只是远远欣赏别人怎样感谢的捐助者,领口也带上了这场交易的标记。

这并不是一次轻松的胜利。她一时连祈祷也做不到,只催队伍赶紧出发。大家仍旧需要她,仍旧相信明天她会好起来;她却留在院里,听行进的乐声渐渐远去。比尔没有因为她摘下徽章便停止奚落,捐款也没有把他变得更容易同人相处。巴巴拉已经无法靠一声喝令,让今天恢复自己期待的次序。

然而,离开行列没有使她停止做眼前的事。比尔临走前,她仍伸手向他告别,尽管他并没有好好接住这份心意;随后,她转向失业的彼得。这个年长的工人已经尝过被生活抛下的滋味,她这时竟觉得自己与他有了新的相似。彼得提醒她,她还有年轻和希望。她答应替他找工作,接着数起身上的钱。

那笔钱比桌边刚写出的支票小得多,却有可以立即说清的用处:两个人喝茶的钱、彼得过夜的住处,以及她自己回家的车费。彼得仍有他的骄傲,不乐意只作受施舍的人。巴巴拉挽住他的胳膊,告诉他,这是朋友之间的分享;同时,她也提出自己的请求,希望他跟自己说话,别让自己哭出来。他不必先接受她的信仰,甚至可以谈那些与她信仰不同的书和演讲。两个人终于一同朝门外走去。

这几笔小开销并不能代替救济所所需的一万英镑,也不能替她找到一条从此不沾任何可疑财富的道路。到第三幕,她还会走进父亲的军工厂,重新寻找自己的工作:她希望面对的是已经吃饱、有住处、能够不领她的情的人,而不是因一片面包便不得不感激的人。那是她随后作出的选择,不是军火生意已被证明无害;她并没有不再看见它会毁掉谁的生活。

但在这一天,院子外的大会尚有大会的热闹,她还没有想清所有问题,彼得今晚的住处却已经需要安排。徽章不在她领口,工作也不再有从前那样确定的名字。她仍有一点钱,彼得仍有许多话可说。离开时,他们没有要求对方先赞同自己对于整个世界的解释,才肯把眼前可以给的东西拿出来。

安德謝夫特不必等人去取筆。他自己帶著自來水筆,只要在桌邊坐下,就能寫出一張五千英鎊的支票。剛才還需要到處籌措的錢,此刻離眾人這樣近。貝恩斯夫人已經感謝了上帝,又催著要把支票帶到下午的大會上;巴巴拉的未婚夫讓開位置,大家一時都靜下來,看著他寫。巴巴拉卻忽然叫停。父親停了筆,其他人轉過身,像是不明白她為什麼偏偏在這個時候開口。

這不是她第一次為籌款著急。她在兼做傳道與救濟的救世軍裡被稱作少校,日常面對的卻是沒有飯吃、沒有工作、需要住處的人。她剛才還催未婚夫給報紙寫求助信:募款會上那一頂頂帽子收來的零錢實在不夠,組織已經警告,錢再不到,救濟所就可能關門。她討厭自己唱著聖歌,卻越來越惦記下一節能多收幾個便士;她來這裡是想幫助人改變生活,不是日日為讓救濟所開著門向人求告。

所以,聽見貝恩斯夫人說有人願捐五千英鎊,她先是歡呼。負責人接著補上條件:還需要另外五人各捐一千,把總數湊到一萬。直到父親說出那位貴族捐款人的原名,她才知道,錢來自波傑的酒業。名字一換,原先只意味著救濟可以繼續的好消息,便牽回了她每天見到的人。她記得酗酒者的掙扎,也記得自己曾反對的酒類廣告。現在,他的名字卻要出現在這場救濟的感謝裡。

巴巴拉願意讓這個人親自走到救濟所,認真面對自己的生活,也願意幫助他。她擔心的是,支票來了,人的生活卻不必改變。對方給了錢,她彷彿便得把過去一直反對的事重新解釋一遍,好使今天的感激不至於顯得矛盾。她越清楚五千英鎊能夠做什麼,就越難把這份感謝當作一句沒有後果的客套。

父親在場,事情又更難了一層。他經營軍火生意,並不打算掩飾;貝恩斯夫人缺少的另一半款項,正由他一人補齊。他早先還對巴巴拉的未婚夫說過,自己可以把救世軍買下來。這是他要在女兒面前證明的本領。所謂買下,未必要成為組織的法律主人;他有把握改變的,是這個院子裡的人將怎樣歡迎他、怎樣解釋他的到來。

貝恩斯夫人有自己的反問:如果明天那些人走到門口,發現救濟所已經關門,喝酒的人會更少,還是更多?她沒有說酒業從此無害,而是說,拿這筆錢去幫助戒酒,正可以使它做一點與出錢者生意相反的事。她每天要使救濟繼續,不能只計算自己有沒有說出漂亮的原則。門外的人不會因為屋裡作出了無可指摘的決定,就少餓一頓。

這個反問真正為難的地方,在於巴巴拉不能假裝自己沒有聽見。眼前的錢能買食物,能保住房屋,這些用途沒有因為來源可疑就消失。可是,能解決一件真切的困難,也不該使它順帶解決出錢者的所有問題。兩位女人在同一處工作,都不願看見那些人重新流落出去;爭執卻越來越像,其中一個若堅持,另一個就必須放棄自己最想守住的東西。

旁邊的比爾正等著看她怎樣回答。此前他打了珍妮和一位老婦人,後來拿著一枚金幣回來,希望交錢以後,一切到此為止。珍妮不收給自己,請他補償老婦人,他卻不肯。等錢被提議轉捐組織,巴巴拉也拒絕了:她要的不是金幣,而是他的靈魂。比爾終於把錢扔在鼓上,現在又看著大支票嘲弄她,原來不是錢買不到解脫,只是自己出得太少。補償受傷的人、使他停止傷人、要求他皈依,本來就不是一件事;大支票帶來的歡慶,卻使巴巴拉更難說清自己究竟堅持什麼。

安德謝夫特比所有人都擅長利用這種為難。他並不在女兒面前裝出悔過的樣子,反倒把軍火生意造成的痛苦說得極重,讓貝恩斯夫人一度退縮,然後忽然換一個方向:既然救世軍勸人和平,自己捐錢給它,不就是支持一項最終會妨礙自己生意的工作?貝恩斯夫人重新欣喜起來。她所相信的,是惡果也能夠被轉成善用;他所欣賞的,卻像是任何一條指責都能在最後替自己贏得歡迎。兩人用不同的心思,把同一張支票交接完成。

她的誠意沒有取消這場勸募中令人不安的部分。剛才,她還用窮人不再仇視有錢人的例子向他展示工作的成效,想借此得到支持;父親則立刻看見了雇主會得到的方便。救濟、傳道、安撫和感謝,沒有一件只是空話,卻也沒有天然分開。巴巴拉想救的人,正在被用來說明這筆捐款對出錢者有什麼好處。她自己同樣沒有站在所有矛盾之外:她也為募款耗盡心力,也曾在錢與人的故事之間不斷調整說法。

支票寫成以後,事情沒有停在賬面。眾人準備參加大會,邀請父親加入行列,還希望巴巴拉親自宣佈組織因他而得救。未婚夫拿來旗幟和長號,玩笑與樂聲一起湧上來。錢替救濟所延續了生活,同時也開始替這一天安排一個值得公開慶祝的故事。對於巴巴拉,跟著走出去,已不只是默許別人收款;她還要帶著自己的稱號,替這份解釋站到眾人面前。

她說自己不能去。貝恩斯夫人含著淚問,是不是認為自己收錢做錯了;巴巴拉卻走過去吻她,讓她去,也承認她為保住組織不得不這樣做。眼前這個人所背負的責任,她仍然願意看見,哪怕自己已經無法加入接下來的歡慶。體諒對方,沒有使剛才的痛苦一筆勾銷。

然後她摘下領口的銀徽章,叫父親過來。父親發現她要把徽章別到自己身上,反倒往後退。她跟過去,仍把它別上,再退開,讓大家看。剛才可以大談自己賺錢方式的人,此刻卻被這一件小東西弄得有些不自在。女兒問他,花五千英鎊得到這麼一點東西,算不算太少。剛才的捐助忽然有了一件可以給大家看的回禮。他不再只是遠遠欣賞別人怎樣感謝的捐助者,領口也帶上了這場交易的標記。

這並不是一次輕鬆的勝利。她一時連祈禱也做不到,只催隊伍趕緊出發。大家仍舊需要她,仍舊相信明天她會好起來;她卻留在院裡,聽行進的樂聲漸漸遠去。比爾沒有因為她摘下徽章便停止奚落,捐款也沒有把他變得更容易同人相處。巴巴拉已經無法靠一聲喝令,讓今天恢復自己期待的次序。

然而,離開行列沒有使她停止做眼前的事。比爾臨走前,她仍伸手向他告別,儘管他並沒有好好接住這份心意;隨後,她轉向失業的彼得。這個年長的工人已經嘗過被生活拋下的滋味,她這時竟覺得自己與他有了新的相似。彼得提醒她,她還有年輕和希望。她答應替他找工作,接著數起身上的錢。

那筆錢比桌邊剛寫出的支票小得多,卻有可以立即說清的用處:兩個人喝茶的錢、彼得過夜的住處,以及她自己回家的車費。彼得仍有他的驕傲,不樂意只作受施捨的人。巴巴拉輓住他的胳膊,告訴他,這是朋友之間的分享;同時,她也提出自己的請求,希望他跟自己說話,別讓自己哭出來。他不必先接受她的信仰,甚至可以談那些與她信仰不同的書和演講。兩個人終於一同朝門外走去。

這幾筆小開銷並不能代替救濟所所需的一萬英鎊,也不能替她找到一條從此不沾任何可疑財富的道路。到第三幕,她還會走進父親的軍工廠,重新尋找自己的工作:她希望面對的是已經吃飽、有住處、能夠不領她的情的人,而不是因一片麵包便不得不感激的人。那是她隨後作出的選擇,不是軍火生意已被證明無害;她並沒有不再看見它會毀掉誰的生活。

但在這一天,院子外的大會尚有大會的熱鬧,她還沒有想清所有問題,彼得今晚的住處卻已經需要安排。徽章不在她領口,工作也不再有從前那樣確定的名字。她仍有一點錢,彼得仍有許多話可說。離開時,他們沒有要求對方先贊同自己對於整個世界的解釋,才肯把眼前可以給的東西拿出來。

Text & sources文本与来源文本與來源

Based on Shaw's Major Barbara, chiefly the latter part of Act II, from the conditional donation through Barbara's departure with Peter Shirley. The discussion also follows Act III to retain the complication of her subsequent decision to work among people at the weapons factory. Dialogue is paraphrased.

依据萧伯纳《巴巴拉少校》英文文本,主要讨论第二幕捐款、摘徽章与离开救济所的连续场面,并读至第三幕末,保留巴巴拉后来走向军工厂的复杂选择。中文人物话语为译述。

依據蕭伯納《巴巴拉少校》英文文本,主要討論第二幕捐款、摘徽章與離開救濟所的連續場面,並讀至第三幕末,保留巴巴拉後來走向軍工廠的複雜選擇。中文人物話語為譯述。