Structures in Drama戏剧里的结构戲劇裡的結構 · 07 / 23
His Daughter Is Standing Before Him: Why Is Proof of Life Not Enough?
杜丽娘已经站在父亲面前:证明一个人活着,为什么还不能让她被认回来
杜麗娘已經站在父親面前:證明一個人活著,為什麼還不能讓她被認回來
The Peony Pavilion · Tang Xianzu
牡丹亭 · 汤显祖
牡丹亭 · 湯顯祖
The mirror confirms that Du Liniang is alive. Her father still refuses her. The final scene of The Peony Pavilion follows the distance between identifying a daughter and making room for the life she brings home.
镜子已经照过,形影已经验明,父亲却仍不肯相认。《牡丹亭》的最后一出把团圆写成许多不同的进展:确认身体、承认婚姻,还要让女儿带着自己后来的生活回家。
鏡子已經照過,形影已經驗明,父親卻仍不肯相認。《牡丹亭》的最後一出把團圓寫成許多不同的進展:確認身體、承認婚姻,還要讓女兒帶著自己後來的生活回家。
These readings discuss key scenes and endings. They read the plays, not particular stage or screen productions.
本系列涉及关键剧情与结局,阅读对象是剧本文本,而非某一场舞台演出或影视改编。
本系列涉及關鍵劇情與結局,閱讀對象是劇本文本,而非某一場舞台演出或影視改編。
Du Bao is ordered to step forward and identify the woman before the court. Liu Mengmei sees his wife and is overcome with emotion. Her father sees something more alarming: an exact likeness of the daughter who died three years ago. He turns to report that this must be a supernatural creature impersonating her. The resemblance does not settle the question. Its very accuracy makes the impersonation seem more dangerous.
This is the final scene of Tang Xianzu’s The Peony Pavilion. Du Liniang has dreamed of a lover, died, returned as a spirit, and been restored to life. The play has taken its audience through these events; resurrection is a fact of its world, not a medical misunderstanding waiting to be explained away. Her father has received a different set of reports: his daughter is dead, her grave has been opened, and a young man claims to be his son-in-law.
The gap matters. Du Bao has not witnessed everything we have, and recognition cannot begin by pretending that he has. But he goes much further than admitting uncertainty. He asks for the woman to be struck down so that the demon will reveal itself. She needs her living body to answer his accusation; he would destroy that body in order to discover what it is. His proposed test could eliminate the person whose identity remains in dispute.
A different test is ordered from within the court. Chen Zuiliang, Liniang’s former teacher, must accompany her to a mirror and then inspect her shadow and the traces of her movement. The mirror shows her face unchanged. Her steps leave marks. Chen reports that she is human. Earlier he brought Du Bao the report of the opened grave; now he must revise the account by which the father has understood what happened.
These are proofs in the play’s supernatural world, where mirrors and shadows distinguish people from ghosts. Their dramatic importance lies in giving the accused woman a way to answer without first submitting to destruction. Her father’s knowledge of her death is no longer the sole means of deciding whether she may be alive. Liniang can move, leave a trace, and then speak.
Once her humanity has been established, she tells her history: the portrait she painted, the stranger she met in a dream, her illness and burial, and Liu’s discovery of the portrait. He, too, is asked to account for his name, his dream, and their meeting. The face that everyone has been examining acquires a sequence of experiences. She has not simply appeared from nowhere; she can say how she came to be here.
Du Bao still objects. Now the argument concerns the reputation of his daughter and the possibility of a marriage formed in this way. The court itself invokes parental authority and matchmaking. It is willing to investigate a resurrection without therefore abandoning the rules by which a respectable marriage is recognized. Establishing that Liniang has a human body does not establish that she has married acceptably.
Her father demands the names of the people who arranged and attended the union. She supplies figures from the underworld. The exchange is funny because she answers his questions in their own terms, while filling those terms with an experience he refuses to admit. The formal positions he requires have occupants; unfortunately for him, they are not the occupants he wanted.
Liniang also invokes the debt she owes Liu for restoring her to life. Yet their relationship is more than payment for a rescue. Her desire precedes her resurrection. Dream, portrait, longing, and encounter have already made a history between them. Reducing that history to an obligation to marry the man who helped her would make her choice smaller, not more persuasive.
She points to the extraordinary reversal before them: her own father will not acknowledge her as she stands alive before him, whereas Liu acknowledged her when she was a ghost. She can make this complaint and still play with words, turning the language of medicinal plants into jokes about parents and her husband. Neither grief nor the solemn setting deprives her of a speaking style. She is more than an exhibit awaiting a verdict.
Then her mother arrives. Du Bao believed that his wife had died during the fighting and had already sought honors for her. Faced with another supposedly dead member of his family, he suspects a coordinated deception. But Lady Zhen has her own account of flight, shelter, and reunion with her daughter. A second life has continued beyond the reach of his information. Unless new arrivals can correct old reports, the certainty with which he mourns his family will prevent him from meeting them.
The court finally accepts Liniang’s resurrection and orders the family to acknowledge one another and the couple to marry. This is a substantial change. The father can no longer have his daughter treated as a dangerous apparition or her husband simply disposed of as a grave robber. Imperial authority gives their relation a public footing. It also protects the space in which they can continue arguing.
That last point becomes important immediately. The scene does not end with the first imperial command. Outside the palace, Du Bao continues calling his daughter a ghost and rejecting Liu. All the evidence is now available: reflection, shadow, testimony, the return of his wife. More evidence alone is not what this encounter lacks.
Liniang asks her father to acknowledge her. He answers that he will do so if she divorces Liu. Only then does she challenge the bargain: must returning to the Du family mean leaving the Liu family? The order of the exchange matters. She is asking to be taken back; he attaches the condition. What began as a dispute about whether this could be his daughter becomes a dispute about which daughter he is willing to receive.
To accept that condition, she would have to leave her intervening life outside the door. Du Bao could recover a familiar face and an earlier arrangement, but the woman before him cannot become someone who never dreamed, loved, died, or returned. Her claim on her parents does not depend on pretending that those experiences left her unchanged.
Nor is Liu ready to erase his own recent history. Du Bao has had him beaten. Chen’s reports helped produce the danger. His anger and mockery make reunion more difficult, but they also prevent it from being imagined entirely through Liniang’s wishes. She wants a family in which both sides can remain. Her husband arrives carrying an injury that she cannot cancel on his behalf.
Liniang tries the arguments available to her. She points to Liu’s success in the imperial examination: he is the top-ranked candidate, a son-in-law her father ought to find impressive. This appeal uses status rather than rising serenely above it. Yet she did not wait for official distinction to fall in love. She is seeking a language her father might hear for a relationship that already exists.
During the quarrel she collapses, and Du Bao cries out for his Liniang. The possessive name breaks through his insistence that she is a ghost. Affection is present alongside refusal. His alarm does not make the divorce condition harmless or prove that he now accepts the marriage. It reveals a father who can love his daughter and still struggle to receive the life she brings with her.
Chunxiang and the Daoist nun arrive with further connections and recollections. Recognition spreads through the group rather than occurring only inside one man’s mind. Liniang then takes her husband’s hand, presses his shoulder, and urges him to bow to his father-in-law. The gesture has to be brought about. It does not flow effortlessly from a shared feeling that everyone has already reached.
A second imperial decree grants honors and sends them home together. The reunion is real, but the work between the two decrees is real too. Proof of life, recognition of marriage, a father’s cry, and a reluctant movement toward another person are separate advances. None can simply stand in for all the others.
Liniang wants her husband and her parents. Her return asks the old family to make room for a life it did not supervise. At the beginning of the encounter, Du Bao would have destroyed the apparent stranger to expose her falseness. At the end he goes home with a daughter and son-in-law. The mirror can show that she casts a human image. Bringing her home requires a place for everything that happened beyond its frame.
杜宝奉命走出班列,辨认站在殿前的女子。柳梦梅也同时上前,看见自己的妻子,悲从中来;父亲看见的却是另一件事:这个人竟然与死去的女儿一模一样。他转身跪奏,自己的女儿三年前已经亡故,眼前如此相像的面孔,必定是妖魅假托而成。相貌没有让争议结束,反而成了伪装得如此逼真的证据。
这是《牡丹亭》的最后一出。杜丽娘已经经历过死亡、魂游与复生,也已经与柳梦梅相守;来到父亲面前,却仍须先回答自己是不是一个活人。对于一路读到这里的人,还魂确实发生了,不是什么误诊或装死。杜宝没有走过女儿走过的路,他知道的是女儿死去、坟墓被打开,以及一个年轻人自称自己的女婿。最初的怀疑并非全然没有认识上的困难。
但是,父亲并不只说自己尚未明白。他请求将这女子当场打死,好让妖魔现形。一项尚待确认的判断,已经被推进为可以消灭被辨认者的处置。柳梦梅哭着反对,认为严父正要一下抹掉女儿。对杜丽娘而言,这比简单的不相信更危险:她需要依靠自己的身体证明活着,父亲却愿意先摧毁这个身体,再决定它究竟是什么。
殿内传下另一种办法,让奏事官陈最良陪她照镜,再到花阴处看形影。镜子映出她的面孔,走路留下踪迹。陈最良回奏,确实是人的身体。这位先前曾报告柳梦梅掘墓的老师,现在又成为确认还魂的见证人。他并非一开始就掌握全部真相,也不是因为已有官职,过去的话便不会错;查验迫使他根据眼前的事情重新报告。
镜子与影子能辨人鬼,属于戏中承认的世界。朝廷没有只因父亲知道女儿死过,就让他的判断成为唯一入口。那位被指为妖的女子,得到了一次以身体、行走和说话回应的机会。她不必先被打死,才证明自己没有死。
查验完成以后,她开始陈述。十六岁时自画春容,梦中遇见一个人,因情而病,死后葬在园中。后来柳梦梅拾得画像,朝夕挂念,两人才在阴阳之间相逢。柳梦梅也被要求说明自己的名字、梦境与经历。此时,她不再只是供人观看的面孔,而是在说自己究竟怎样走到了这里。
杜宝听完,仍然反对。他认为这不只是在欺骗朝廷,也玷污女儿的名声。于是问题从能否复生,转向一个女儿是否可能以这样的方式结婚。殿内的问话也并非完全站在年轻人一边,同样引用父母之命、媒妁之言,询问她自行成婚有何依据。确认人身没有自动越过婚姻所面对的家族规矩。
杜丽娘以柳梦梅使自己重新活过来的恩情回应。父亲追问谁保亲、谁送亲,她却把阴间的保亲者与送亲者一一道来,越答越使父亲恼怒。这段交锋有真正的喜剧性:父亲用人间婚礼的名目盘问,她并没有放弃这些名目,而是让自己的奇异经历走进它们,报出一份父亲不愿听的答案。
杜丽娘的回应之所以不只是一句报恩,还因为她的情意早在还魂以前已经发生。她并非被从坟中带出来以后,才不得不嫁给提供帮助的人。梦、画像、相思与后来的相逢,使这段关系拥有自己的过程;若只剩“他救了我,所以我属于他”,同样会把她已经说出的选择说窄。
她终于直接指出眼前的颠倒:自己活生生站在这里,亲生父亲不认;做鬼时,反而有人认她为亲。她仍想找母亲,又以药名中的父、母与父亲刚拿来嘲笑柳梦梅的槟榔做起文章。哭诉与俏皮并不矛盾。这个还魂女子有自己的口齿,并没有因为身处殿前,就只剩一位等待判决的人。
母亲此时进来,父亲又吃了一惊。他一直以为妻子死在战乱中,甚至已经奏请旌表,如今妻子也来到面前。他便怀疑,妖鬼是不是又捏造了一路母女。舞台再次摆出相似的处境:一位根据自己所知已经死去的人,带着他不知道的经历回来了。过去的报告若永远不能被新到的人纠正,越确定的相信就越难让一家人相见。
母亲说明自己如何避乱、寄居,又怎样在临安与女儿相遇。她不是只站出来要求丈夫相信,因为她是母亲;她带来另一条经过不同地点、与杜宝不相同的生活路径。朝廷根据这些陈述继续判断,确认丽娘重生,再命父女相认、夫妻成亲,一同归家。
这里确有一个公共结果。柳梦梅不再只是杜宝口中的掘墓贼,杜丽娘也不必在父亲要求除妖的指控下独自申辩。诏旨为他们的身份与婚姻提供了能在外部成立的安排。若只因皇帝介入就说爱情虚假,会漏掉这道命令确实制止了什么,又使谁能够安全地继续说话。
然而,这出戏没有在诏旨传完的地方结束。走出宫门,杜宝仍称柳梦梅为贼,仍叫女儿是鬼。两人真正面对的,并不只是缺少一份可以拿给父亲看的证明。镜子照过,形影看过,母亲也作了说明,父亲却尚未找到一种自己愿意接受的方式,把经历过这些事的女儿认回来。
杜丽娘请父亲认回自己,父亲却把离异列作条件。她这才反问,难道要回杜家便得离开柳家?她没有因为父亲严厉,就宣布从此与父母无关;她想知道这段亲属关系还容不容得下自己。最初那个“不可能是女儿”的问题,此刻已经变成“什么样的女儿才可以回来”。
若她真的只能按这个条件返回,就必须把自己最重要的一段后来生活放在门外。父亲愿意认回的,不仅是一张与记忆相同的脸,还要是一个能够重新进入原来安排的女儿。女儿却无法把三年的死亡、相逢和复生全部倒回去。活过来的人不只是从前的人重新出现,也带着从前没有的关系。
父亲可以关心对方是谁,担心女儿受到欺骗,也可以追问她如何理解自己的未来。亲属之间并不需要把关切全部撤掉。困难在于,眼前已经不只是请求说明,而是要求她先取消一段已确认的关系,才有资格重新成为自己的女儿。
柳梦梅也没有因为皇帝认可婚姻,就忽然忘记此前受过的对待。他与岳父争辩、讥讽,对陈最良的错误报告同样不肯轻轻放过。这使团圆不能只从杜丽娘一人的愿望推出来。她想把双方带回一家,丈夫却有自己的伤与愤怒,父亲又有身份和颜面;他们站得越来越近,不表示距离已经一起消失。
杜丽娘仍然周旋。她指给父亲看柳梦梅的状元身份,也会责怪丈夫,说他不该那样刺激老人。这些话不能全部拔高成超越门第的宣言,她也会使用父亲能够承认的体面和名位。可是,她并不是等到柳梦梅有了乌纱才有情。眼前的劝说,是在已有的情意上寻找能让家人听进去的话,而非重新用名位决定该爱谁。
争执中,她一时气结倒下,父亲惊呼自己的丽娘。刚才反复坚持妖鬼之说的人,情急时仍然叫出了女儿的名字。关心并非全无,严厉也不等于内心从没有爱;父亲能够疼爱女儿,又尚未接受女儿现在的婚姻,两件事可以同时在场。
父亲的惊呼没有让离异条件自动变得无害。这个动作使藏在争论里的牵挂显现,让人物没有被一句专横永久说完。至于这种牵挂能否接纳她仍然清醒时说出的要求,还得看后来如何继续。
春香与石道姑也赶来,各自认亲,说起旧事。团圆不只靠父亲从一个答案换成另一个答案,还靠这些具体的人重新把称呼和经历接上。熟悉的名字、照料过彼此的关系与新到的消息,使先前围绕真假展开的场面逐渐变成了一家人怎样同处的问题。
杜丽娘又拉柳梦梅去拜岳父。剧本把牵手、按肩和劝拜都写进来,夫妇之间并非没有不情愿,也没有一下失去机智和顶撞。她不能替丈夫把挨打的旧事取消,丈夫也不能仅凭自己的受辱,就要求她不再眷恋父母。相互施礼在这里是仍需促成的行动,不是大家心中已经完全相同之后自然出现的装饰。
最后又有诏旨,确认一家恩荣,众人一同回去。这是作品实际给出的团圆。第二道诏旨与此前许多动作也说明,第一次证明人身以后,还发生了多少事。身份获准、婚姻成立、父亲叫出女儿、丈夫愿意靠近,是不同的进展;它们可以帮助彼此,却不是完成一项便已完成全部。
这一结尾因此不必与娜拉的离开争出哪种生活更自由。杜丽娘想保留丈夫,也想回到父母身边;她寻找的是让旧关系容纳新经历,而不是只在两边择一。她的归家若值得珍惜,正在于她最终不是先抹去婚姻再回来。回到一家,也可以要求这家人不再完全照旧。
杜宝曾经要求把与女儿相像的人打死以辨真伪,最后则与女儿女婿同归。这个距离不能被说成什么都没有改变,也不必被一声团圆完全擦掉。镜子让一副身体显出形影,女儿却还要说话、争辩、牵人靠近,才能使自己的后来生活一起被带回。证明她活着,只是让父亲不能再把她当作一件要除去的怪事;认回她,还需要给那段自己没有参与、却真实发生过的人生留下地方。
杜寶奉命走出班列,辨認站在殿前的女子。柳夢梅也同時上前,看見自己的妻子,悲從中來;父親看見的卻是另一件事:這個人竟然與死去的女兒一模一樣。他轉身跪奏,自己的女兒三年前已經亡故,眼前如此相像的面孔,必定是妖魅假托而成。相貌沒有讓爭議結束,反而成了偽裝得如此逼真的證據。
這是《牡丹亭》的最後一出。杜麗娘已經經歷過死亡、魂游與復生,也已經與柳夢梅相守;來到父親面前,卻仍須先回答自己是不是一個活人。對於一路讀到這裡的人,還魂確實發生了,不是什麼誤診或裝死。杜寶沒有走過女兒走過的路,他知道的是女兒死去、墳墓被打開,以及一個年輕人自稱自己的女婿。最初的懷疑並非全然沒有認識上的困難。
但是,父親並不只說自己尚未明白。他請求將這女子當場打死,好讓妖魔現形。一項尚待確認的判斷,已經被推進為可以消滅被辨認者的處置。柳夢梅哭著反對,認為嚴父正要一下抹掉女兒。對杜麗娘而言,這比簡單的不相信更危險:她需要依靠自己的身體證明活著,父親卻願意先摧毀這個身體,再決定它究竟是什麼。
殿內傳下另一種辦法,讓奏事官陳最良陪她照鏡,再到花陰處看形影。鏡子映出她的面孔,走路留下蹤跡。陳最良回奏,確實是人的身體。這位先前曾報告柳夢梅掘墓的老師,現在又成為確認還魂的見證人。他並非一開始就掌握全部真相,也不是因為已有官職,過去的話便不會錯;查驗迫使他根據眼前的事情重新報告。
鏡子與影子能辨人鬼,屬於戲中承認的世界。朝廷沒有只因父親知道女兒死過,就讓他的判斷成為唯一入口。那位被指為妖的女子,得到了一次以身體、行走和說話回應的機會。她不必先被打死,才證明自己沒有死。
查驗完成以後,她開始陳述。十六歲時自畫春容,夢中遇見一個人,因情而病,死後葬在園中。後來柳夢梅拾得畫像,朝夕掛念,兩人才在陰陽之間相逢。柳夢梅也被要求說明自己的名字、夢境與經歷。此時,她不再只是供人觀看的面孔,而是在說自己究竟怎樣走到了這裡。
杜寶聽完,仍然反對。他認為這不只是在欺騙朝廷,也玷污女兒的名聲。於是問題從能否復生,轉向一個女兒是否可能以這樣的方式結婚。殿內的問話也並非完全站在年輕人一邊,同樣引用父母之命、媒妁之言,詢問她自行成婚有何依據。確認人身沒有自動越過婚姻所面對的家族規矩。
杜麗娘以柳夢梅使自己重新活過來的恩情回應。父親追問誰保親、誰送親,她卻把陰間的保親者與送親者一一道來,越答越使父親惱怒。這段交鋒有真正的喜劇性:父親用人間婚禮的名目盤問,她並沒有放棄這些名目,而是讓自己的奇異經歷走進它們,報出一份父親不願聽的答案。
杜麗娘的回應之所以不只是一句報恩,還因為她的情意早在還魂以前已經發生。她並非被從墳中帶出來以後,才不得不嫁給提供幫助的人。夢、畫像、相思與後來的相逢,使這段關係擁有自己的過程;若只剩「他救了我,所以我屬於他」,同樣會把她已經說出的選擇說窄。
她終於直接指出眼前的顛倒:自己活生生站在這裡,親生父親不認;做鬼時,反而有人認她為親。她仍想找母親,又以藥名中的父、母與父親剛拿來嘲笑柳夢梅的檳榔做起文章。哭訴與俏皮並不矛盾。這個還魂女子有自己的口齒,並沒有因為身處殿前,就只剩一位等待判決的人。
母親此時進來,父親又吃了一驚。他一直以為妻子死在戰亂中,甚至已經奏請旌表,如今妻子也來到面前。他便懷疑,妖鬼是不是又捏造了一路母女。舞台再次擺出相似的處境:一位根據自己所知已經死去的人,帶著他不知道的經歷回來了。過去的報告若永遠不能被新到的人糾正,越確定的相信就越難讓一家人相見。
母親說明自己如何避亂、寄居,又怎樣在臨安與女兒相遇。她不是只站出來要求丈夫相信,因為她是母親;她帶來另一條經過不同地點、與杜寶不相同的生活路徑。朝廷根據這些陳述繼續判斷,確認麗娘重生,再命父女相認、夫妻成親,一同歸家。
這裡確有一個公共結果。柳夢梅不再只是杜寶口中的掘墓賊,杜麗娘也不必在父親要求除妖的指控下獨自申辯。詔旨為他們的身分與婚姻提供了能在外部成立的安排。若只因皇帝介入就說愛情虛假,會漏掉這道命令確實制止了什麼,又使誰能夠安全地繼續說話。
然而,這出戲沒有在詔旨傳完的地方結束。走出宮門,杜寶仍稱柳夢梅為賊,仍叫女兒是鬼。兩人真正面對的,並不只是缺少一份可以拿給父親看的證明。鏡子照過,形影看過,母親也作了說明,父親卻尚未找到一種自己願意接受的方式,把經歷過這些事的女兒認回來。
杜麗娘請父親認回自己,父親卻把離異列作條件。她這才反問,難道要回杜家便得離開柳家?她沒有因為父親嚴厲,就宣佈從此與父母無關;她想知道這段親屬關係還容不容得下自己。最初那個「不可能是女兒」的問題,此刻已經變成「什麼樣的女兒才可以回來」。
若她真的只能按這個條件返回,就必須把自己最重要的一段後來生活放在門外。父親願意認回的,不僅是一張與記憶相同的臉,還要是一個能夠重新進入原來安排的女兒。女兒卻無法把三年的死亡、相逢和復生全部倒回去。活過來的人不只是從前的人重新出現,也帶著從前沒有的關係。
父親可以關心對方是誰,擔心女兒受到欺騙,也可以追問她如何理解自己的未來。親屬之間並不需要把關切全部撤掉。困難在於,眼前已經不只是請求說明,而是要求她先取消一段已確認的關係,才有資格重新成為自己的女兒。
柳夢梅也沒有因為皇帝認可婚姻,就忽然忘記此前受過的對待。他與岳父爭辯、譏諷,對陳最良的錯誤報告同樣不肯輕輕放過。這使團圓不能只從杜麗娘一人的願望推出來。她想把雙方帶回一家,丈夫卻有自己的傷與憤怒,父親又有身分和顏面;他們站得越來越近,不表示距離已經一起消失。
杜麗娘仍然周旋。她指給父親看柳夢梅的狀元身分,也會責怪丈夫,說他不該那樣刺激老人。這些話不能全部拔高成超越門第的宣言,她也會使用父親能夠承認的體面和名位。可是,她並不是等到柳夢梅有了烏紗才有情。眼前的勸說,是在已有的情意上尋找能讓家人聽進去的話,而非重新用名位決定該愛誰。
爭執中,她一時氣結倒下,父親驚呼自己的麗娘。剛才反復堅持妖鬼之說的人,情急時仍然叫出了女兒的名字。關心並非全無,嚴厲也不等於內心從沒有愛;父親能夠疼愛女兒,又尚未接受女兒現在的婚姻,兩件事可以同時在場。
父親的驚呼沒有讓離異條件自動變得無害。這個動作使藏在爭論裡的牽掛顯現,讓人物沒有被一句專橫永久說完。至於這種牽掛能否接納她仍然清醒時說出的要求,還得看後來如何繼續。
春香與石道姑也趕來,各自認親,說起舊事。團圓不只靠父親從一個答案換成另一個答案,還靠這些具體的人重新把稱呼和經歷接上。熟悉的名字、照料過彼此的關係與新到的消息,使先前圍繞真假展開的場面逐漸變成了一家人怎樣同處的問題。
杜麗娘又拉柳夢梅去拜岳父。劇本把牽手、按肩和勸拜都寫進來,夫婦之間並非沒有不情願,也沒有一下失去機智和頂撞。她不能替丈夫把挨打的舊事取消,丈夫也不能僅憑自己的受辱,就要求她不再眷戀父母。相互施禮在這裡是仍需促成的行動,不是大家心中已經完全相同之後自然出現的裝飾。
最後又有詔旨,確認一家恩榮,眾人一同回去。這是作品實際給出的團圓。第二道詔旨與此前許多動作也說明,第一次證明人身以後,還發生了多少事。身分獲准、婚姻成立、父親叫出女兒、丈夫願意靠近,是不同的進展;它們可以幫助彼此,卻不是完成一項便已完成全部。
這一結尾因此不必與娜拉的離開爭出哪種生活更自由。杜麗娘想保留丈夫,也想回到父母身邊;她尋找的是讓舊關係容納新經歷,而不是只在兩邊擇一。她的歸家若值得珍惜,正在於她最終不是先抹去婚姻再回來。回到一家,也可以要求這家人不再完全照舊。
杜寶曾經要求把與女兒相像的人打死以辨真偽,最後則與女兒女婿同歸。這個距離不能被說成什麼都沒有改變,也不必被一聲團圓完全擦掉。鏡子讓一副身體顯出形影,女兒卻還要說話、爭辯、牽人靠近,才能使自己的後來生活一起被帶回。證明她活著,只是讓父親不能再把她當作一件要除去的怪事;認回她,還需要給那段自己沒有參與、卻真實發生過的人生留下地方。
Text & sources文本与来源文本與來源
This essay discusses the ending of The Peony Pavilion, scene 55, “Yuanjia.” The edition reference is Waseda University Library’s two-volume Yuming tang huanhun ji, call number 文庫06 01071, a Mengfeng lou Nuanhong shi reprint with no publication year specified in the catalogue. The lower-volume image index locates the scene at digital images p0100–p0111. A public Chinese transcription is also linked. The discussion includes the arguments and gestures after the first imperial command, continuing to the final decree and departure.
本文讨论《牡丹亭》第五十五出《圆驾》,涉及全剧结局。版本线索见早稻田大学图书馆藏《玉茗堂还魂记》上下卷,文库06 01071,梦凤楼暖红室重刊本;馆录注明刊年未详,属冰丝馆原刻的重刊。卷下图像目录可按数码图像序号 p0100—p0111 查找本出,另附公开剧文转录便于阅读。正文保留首次相认成亲之旨之后的父女交锋、劝拜与最终诏旨,不把第一次传旨当作全剧结束。
本文討論《牡丹亭》第五十五出《圓駕》,涉及全劇結局。版本線索見早稻田大學圖書館藏《玉茗堂還魂記》上下卷,文庫06 01071,夢鳳樓暖紅室重刊本;館錄注明刊年未詳,屬冰絲館原刻的重刊。卷下圖像目錄可按數碼圖像序號 p0100—p0111 查找本出,另附公開劇文轉錄便於閱讀。正文保留首次相認成親之旨之後的父女交鋒、勸拜與最終詔旨,不把第一次傳旨當作全劇結束。
- Waseda University Library: edition and catalogue record早稻田大学图书馆:《玉茗堂还魂记》馆藏著录早稻田大學圖書館:《玉茗堂還魂記》館藏著錄
- Waseda lower-volume image index: scene 55 at p0100–p0111早稻田卷下图像目录:《圆驾》见 p0100—p0111早稻田卷下圖像目錄:《圓駕》見 p0100—p0111
- Wikisource: public Chinese transcription of scene 55维基文库:《牡丹亭》第五十五出《圆驾》公开转录維基文庫:《牡丹亭》第五十五出《圓駕》公開轉錄