Non DubitoA Mind in Many Languages
Search搜索搜尋
EN

Leaving & belonging离开与归属離開與歸屬

Clearing: Meeting Someone Before You Know Their Past

《林间空地》:认识一个人,是从现在慢慢走进他的过去

《林間空地》:認識一個人,是從現在慢慢走進他的過去

Lev struggles to buy a tram ticket in Zurich, then recognizes the wood beneath his hand. Iris Wolff's backward-moving novel gives our first impressions time to change.

在苏黎世,Lev不会买电车票,却一摸就认出了柜台的木头。小说倒着往回走,让我们有机会重新理解最初遇见的这个人。

在蘇黎世,Lev不會買電車票,卻一摸就認出了櫃台的木頭。小說倒著往回走,讓我們有機會重新理解最初遇見的這個人。

Original title原书名原書名: Lichtungen · German德语德語

Iris Wolff · Original publication原作首版原作首版 · Klett-Cotta

Han Qin (秦汉) · Guide published导读发布導讀發佈

Discusses the reunion and the novel's reverse chronology, leaving the crucial childhood events and the relationship's direction undisclosed. Includes childhood trauma, political repression and displacement. Clearing is the published English title; the linked Litrix sample is a separate selection translated before that edition.

涉及童年创伤、政治压迫与离散。介绍重逢处境及倒叙形式,保留童年事件的关键内情与两人的关系走向。《林间空地》为参考译名;正式英文版题为Clearing。

涉及童年創傷、政治壓迫與離散。介紹重逢處境及倒敘形式,保留童年事件的關鍵內情與兩人的關係走向。《林間空地》為參考譯名;正式英文版題為Clearing。

In Zurich, Lev cannot work out how to buy a tram ticket.

He has written directions. What defeats him is the machine: its buttons, the fares, the place to put the money. Kato comes to his rescue and buys him a weekly pass. Later, at the guesthouse, his hand passes over the wooden counter. Maple, he thinks.

Those two moments, from the authorized selections published by Litrix, offer an excellent way into Iris Wolff's Clearing. Here is someone baffled by an ordinary transaction who immediately notices something most of us would overlook. Being unable to buy a ticket tells us about his difficulty in Zurich. It does not tell us everything about him.

The scene occurs in chapter eight, early in the book but not at its beginning. We have met Lev without yet knowing him well. Already, there is a reason to keep our judgment provisional.

The person who went away

Lev and Kato grew up in a village in northern Romania, in the Maramureș region. Their childhood belongs to the years of Ceaușescu's dictatorship; the upheavals around 1989 alter the possibilities of movement, work and ordinary life. Opening a border, however, does not give everyone the same destination.

Kato goes to Western Europe and makes a living as a pavement artist. Lev remains more closely attached to home, to the forest and to working with wood. They keep in touch, but their days become increasingly unlike one another.

A quick account could make this a contrast between courage and fear. One person embraces freedom; another cannot let go. That would be an efficient way to describe a relationship, and a poor way to become curious about it.

Departure has a ready vocabulary: opportunity, adventure, escape. Staying often has to defend itself against the suspicion of failure. Before placing Lev and Kato on that scale, it is worth asking what each person is attached to, and what each would lose by changing their life.

Then a postcard from Kato invites Lev to Zurich. By the time they meet, they have not seen each other for five years.

Letters can preserve a connection across that interval. They cannot quite prepare you for standing beside someone again. A familiar voice comes from a body that has continued living elsewhere. Old ease and new awkwardness may arrive together.

Wolff does not require us to settle the relationship's name before attending to it. Lev and Kato have mattered to one another for a long time. How friendship and love share that history is part of the attraction of continuing.

Nine, eight, seven

The novel counts its chapters backward, from nine to one. We approach the adult Lev first and move toward his youth and childhood.

A conventional coming-of-age story invites us to wonder who a child will become. This arrangement turns the question around. Having seen a man hesitate, remain silent or make a journey, we begin to wonder what it took for him to reach that moment.

In her interview with Laura Möndel, Wolff connects the backward movement to the way people actually get to know one another. We encounter the person in front of us; their past emerges as the acquaintance continues.

It is a simple observation with considerable consequences for a reader. Most people do not arrive with an account of their upbringing attached. A quiet colleague might remain a quiet colleague for years before telling us something that changes the meaning of that quietness. Nothing about the original encounter was false. It was incomplete.

A novel can spare us that uncertainty by explaining everyone at once. Wolff asks us to spend some time without the explanation.

This need not turn the past into a box containing the correct answer. There would be little gain in reversing chronology if every childhood scene merely proved that the adult had always been destined to behave as he does. The more interesting possibility is that earlier moments revise our understanding without closing it.

The German original is only a little over 250 pages long, yet it crosses decades. Selection does much of the work that a longer novel might give to continuous narration. Some periods become vivid; others are separated by gaps. Those intervals ask for patience, but they also resemble how another person's life reaches us.

What a place teaches you to notice

Readers unfamiliar with Romanian history need not complete a course before beginning. A useful first orientation is that these characters have lived through restrictions on movement and then through a time when leaving becomes possible for many people.

That change is more than a personality test. Wanting to leave and being able to leave are different experiences. So are remaining by choice and discovering that the people around you are disappearing.

In her Litrix review, Kristina Maidt-Zinke describes Wolff's treatment of historical change through scenes, landscapes and encounters, rather than a systematic sequence of political events. She also draws attention to the movement between sensory impressions and reflection.

This is useful guidance for approaching the book. History gives weight to a departure or a return without turning the characters into guides stationed beside the major dates.

The forest deserves similar attention. It is tempting to turn woodland immediately into a symbol of roots or belonging. But the counter in Zurich suggests something more ordinary and more specific: Lev knows wood. His working life has trained his hand and his attention.

A place enters a person through such habits. The things you can recognize, repair or find your way through may not be the things that make you look capable somewhere else. In Zurich, the ticket machine and the maple counter belong to the same visit.

The title offers a helpful expectation for the reading itself. A clearing lets you see part of a landscape. Trees still surround it. You have gained a view, not possession of the whole forest.

How much do we need explained?

There are reasons a reader might resist this approach. In her review for Literaturzeitschrift.de, Eva Luber admires the writing about mountains, seasons and the natural world, while finding some chapter epigraphs difficult to interpret and some questions insufficiently resolved.

That reservation should not be waved away as an inability to appreciate ambiguity. Gaps can be suggestive; they can also leave someone unsatisfied. Wanting an explanation is not a literary failing.

Wolff, in the Möndel interview, is willing to leave the boundary between friendship and love open. She also acknowledges that she does not possess all her characters' secrets. The invitation is to get closer to them, without assuming that closeness must eventually produce a complete account.

Readers who enjoy small gestures, restrained prose and the strangeness that survives a long acquaintance may find that invitation compelling. Those looking primarily for a rapidly advancing plot or an unmistakable romance will want to adjust their expectations.

For English readers, the published edition is *Clearing*, translated by Ruth Martin. The Litrix selection linked above, translated by Alexandra Roesch under the earlier sample title Glimmer of Light, is a different text and covers several selected passages.

What stays with me as a point of entry is the man at the tram stop. He has made it a long way from home. We can see that buying a ticket is difficult for him. We do not yet know how difficult it was to decide to come.

As the pages move forward, time moves backward. The pleasure on offer is the possibility of returning, in thought, to that first encounter and seeing a little more.

到了苏黎世,Lev首先遇到的难题,是怎样买一张电车票。

他带着写好路线的纸条,却被机器上的按钮、票价和投币口弄得无所适从。Kato出现,替他买了周票。稍后到了旅馆,他摸过柜台的木头,心里想,这是枫木。

这两个小动作挨在一起,很能说明Iris Wolff写人的方式。一个人可以在别人熟悉的生活里笨拙,又对别人毫不留意的东西十分敏锐。不会买票,并没有穷尽Lev是怎样的人。

这是《林间空地》的第八章选段,在书中出现得较早,但并非小说第一幕。我们还不太了解Lev,却已经愿意暂缓判断,跟着他再走一点。

一个人离开,一个人留下

Lev和Kato在罗马尼亚北部马拉穆列什地区的一个村庄长大。他们的童年处在齐奥塞斯库统治时期,后来经历1989年前后的巨变。边境、职业与出行的可能都在变化,而这种变化并没有使每个人走向同一个方向。

Kato去了西欧,以街头绘画谋生。Lev则与家乡、森林和木头保持着更深的联系。两个人没有随着距离增长而彻底断开来往,但彼此的日常生活越来越不相同。

从外面看,这很容易被概括成一个敢走,一个不敢走;一个选择自由,一个困在过去。然而小说给我们的初步印象没有这么整齐。Kato的行动力很鲜明,Lev的迟疑也很真实,但他们不是一道关于勇气的选择题。

对于离开的人,我们通常比较容易理解其愿望:更大的世界、更多机会、较少束缚。留下的愿望则常被解释成某种欠缺,好像不走总需要自证。把这本书带入阅读时,不妨先放下这种排序,看Lev究竟与什么相连,Kato又究竟想摆脱什么。

让他终于出发的,是Kato从苏黎世寄来的一次邀请。他们已经五年没有见面。信件还能维持联系,真正站到对方面前,却是另一回事:声音、动作和相处的距离,都需要重新感受。

小说没有要求我们先把这段关系命名,再决定它值不值得关心。两人的相识很久,重要也很久,但这种重要究竟容纳多少友情、多少爱情,可以跟着故事慢慢辨认。

章节从九走到一

《林间空地》最显眼的形式选择,是倒着讲述。章节编号从九开始,逐步退回一。我们先接近已经长大的Lev,再向他的青年时代和童年走去。

所以,这里的悬念与通常的成长小说略有不同。不是单纯地等一个孩子长大,看他将来会成为谁,而是看见一个成年人以后,渐渐想知道:他怎么走到了这里?我们刚才理解为沉默、固执或者退缩的东西,是否还有未被看见的来处?

Wolff在接受Laura Möndel采访时说,这种顺序接近人们在现实中相识的方式:先认识眼前的人,关系持续下去,才陆续知道他的过去。

这是一个不复杂、却很能改变阅读姿态的想法。我们每天遇到的人,都不会随身附带一份完整的成长说明。倘若小说也暂时不提供说明,读者就要与自己的第一印象相处,而不能立刻躲到全知的位置上。

回溯也因此不只是查找一个原因。倘若每走进一段往事,都只是为了证明眼前的人果然如此,那么倒叙不过是延迟公布答案。更有意思的读法,是允许过去改变我们对现在的看法,而不急着把每个动作都解释干净。

这部书的篇幅不算大,德文初版二百五十余页,却跨过数十年的生活。它依靠的是选取,而非逐年交代。有些年月被照亮,有些时间只留下间隔。读者需要在这些间隔之间保持一点耐心。

历史不只发生在远处

如果对罗马尼亚近现代史不很熟悉,是否会读不进去?必要的背景其实可以先抓住一点:这两个人经历了一个限制流动的社会,也经历了旧秩序松动以后,人们向不同地方离开的年代。

这足以使“走还是留”不只是一项私人性格测验。有时候,人想走而走不了;后来能够走了,留下什么、依靠什么,又成了新的问题。一个地方发生变化,并不意味着生活在那里的人会同时准备好。

Kristina Maidt-Zinke在Litrix的书评中,特别注意到小说呈现时代变动的方式:它不系统排列政治事件,而通过地方、人物与片段使变化显露。她也强调,Wolff的语言能够让感官印象与思考自然相接。

因此,这不是一本借两位主人公带我们快速游览东欧历史的书。历史背景有分量,却没有取代他们的感受。对刚刚进入作品的人来说,先记住谁离开了、谁仍然留在原处,往往比立刻把每段叙述对应到年代更重要。

同样,森林也不宜只被当作一个方便的象征。前面的木头细节已经提醒我们,Lev有一套具体的注意方式。人在什么地方工作,习惯用眼睛看什么、用手辨认什么,会进入他与世界相处的方法。

从这一点回看书名,林间空地带来的吸引并不是一切都被照亮,而是可以短暂地看清一部分。周围仍然有树,有视线到不了的地方。用这样的期待进入小说,也许比要求人物最终交出全部解释更合适。

它邀请的是慢一点的阅读

《林间空地》当然也可能使一些读者感到不够满足。Eva Luber在Literaturzeitschrift.de的书评中,赞赏其中关于自然、山地和季节的语言,同时坦言,部分章首引语的意义难以把握;细节不断增加,有些疑问却没有得到她期待的明确说明。

这个保留值得认真看待。留白并不会自动成为优点,正如解释充分也不一定破坏文学。读者会有不同的需要:有人喜欢一段关系保持难以归类的状态,有人则需要知道几件关键事情究竟怎么发生。

Wolff本人愿意让友情与爱情之间的边界保持开放。在同一篇访谈里,她也承认,自己并不掌握人物的所有秘密。这提示了一种阅读约定:这部小说更在意接近一个人,不急于完成对他的说明。

如果你喜欢细微的动作、克制的语言,以及相识很久的人之间仍然存在的陌生感,这样的约定很可能具有吸引力。若主要期待事件连续推进,或希望一段关系早早进入明确的爱情轨道,则需要调整预期。

英语读者可以选择Moth Books出版的Clearing,由Ruth Martin翻译。Litrix另有以Glimmer of Light为题、Alexandra Roesch翻译的展示选段,与这部正式英译本不同。

对我来说,最愿意带进阅读的仍是苏黎世那张车票。一个连电车票都买得有些吃力的人,已经走到了很远的地方。我们暂时只看见他的迟疑,却不知道这次出发对他究竟有多难。

继续往前翻,时间反而往后走。小说给人的机会,是在越来越认识Lev之后,再想起最初遇见他的那个站台。

到了蘇黎世,Lev首先遇到的難題,是怎樣買一張電車票。

他帶著寫好路線的紙條,卻被機器上的按鈕、票價和投幣口弄得無所適從。Kato出現,替他買了周票。稍後到了旅館,他摸過櫃台的木頭,心裡想,這是楓木。

這兩個小動作挨在一起,很能說明Iris Wolff寫人的方式。一個人可以在別人熟悉的生活裡笨拙,又對別人毫不留意的東西十分敏銳。不會買票,並沒有窮盡Lev是怎樣的人。

這是《林間空地》的第八章選段,在書中出現得較早,但並非小說第一幕。我們還不太瞭解Lev,卻已經願意暫緩判斷,跟著他再走一點。

一個人離開,一個人留下

Lev和Kato在羅馬尼亞北部馬拉穆列什地區的一個村莊長大。他們的童年處在齊奧塞斯庫統治時期,後來經歷1989年前後的巨變。邊境、職業與出行的可能都在變化,而這種變化並沒有使每個人走向同一個方向。

Kato去了西歐,以街頭繪畫謀生。Lev則與家鄉、森林和木頭保持著更深的聯繫。兩個人沒有隨著距離增長而徹底斷開來往,但彼此的日常生活越來越不相同。

從外面看,這很容易被概括成一個敢走,一個不敢走;一個選擇自由,一個困在過去。然而小說給我們的初步印象沒有這麼整齊。Kato的行動力很鮮明,Lev的遲疑也很真實,但他們不是一道關於勇氣的選擇題。

對於離開的人,我們通常比較容易理解其願望:更大的世界、更多機會、較少束縛。留下的願望則常被解釋成某種欠缺,好像不走總需要自證。把這本書帶入閱讀時,不妨先放下這種排序,看Lev究竟與什麼相連,Kato又究竟想擺脫什麼。

讓他終於出發的,是Kato從蘇黎世寄來的一次邀請。他們已經五年沒有見面。信件還能維持聯繫,真正站到對方面前,卻是另一回事:聲音、動作和相處的距離,都需要重新感受。

小說沒有要求我們先把這段關係命名,再決定它值不值得關心。兩人的相識很久,重要也很久,但這種重要究竟容納多少友情、多少愛情,可以跟著故事慢慢辨認。

章節從九走到一

《林間空地》最顯眼的形式選擇,是倒著講述。章節編號從九開始,逐步退回一。我們先接近已經長大的Lev,再向他的青年時代和童年走去。

所以,這裡的懸念與通常的成長小說略有不同。不是單純地等一個孩子長大,看他將來會成為誰,而是看見一個成年人以後,漸漸想知道:他怎麼走到了這裡?我們剛才理解為沈默、固執或者退縮的東西,是否還有未被看見的來處?

Wolff在接受Laura Möndel採訪時說,這種順序接近人們在現實中相識的方式:先認識眼前的人,關係持續下去,才陸續知道他的過去。

這是一個不複雜、卻很能改變閱讀姿態的想法。我們每天遇到的人,都不會隨身附帶一份完整的成長說明。倘若小說也暫時不提供說明,讀者就要與自己的第一印象相處,而不能立刻躲到全知的位置上。

回溯也因此不只是查找一個原因。倘若每走進一段往事,都只是為了證明眼前的人果然如此,那麼倒敘不過是延遲公佈答案。更有意思的讀法,是允許過去改變我們對現在的看法,而不急著把每個動作都解釋乾淨。

這部書的篇幅不算大,德文初版二百五十餘頁,卻跨過數十年的生活。它依靠的是選取,而非逐年交代。有些年月被照亮,有些時間只留下間隔。讀者需要在這些間隔之間保持一點耐心。

歷史不只發生在遠處

如果對羅馬尼亞近現代史不很熟悉,是否會讀不進去?必要的背景其實可以先抓住一點:這兩個人經歷了一個限制流動的社會,也經歷了舊秩序鬆動以後,人們向不同地方離開的年代。

這足以使「走還是留」不只是一項私人性格測驗。有時候,人想走而走不了;後來能夠走了,留下什麼、依靠什麼,又成了新的問題。一個地方發生變化,並不意味著生活在那裡的人會同時準備好。

Kristina Maidt-Zinke在Litrix的書評中,特別注意到小說呈現時代變動的方式:它不系統排列政治事件,而通過地方、人物與片段使變化顯露。她也強調,Wolff的語言能夠讓感官印象與思考自然相接。

因此,這不是一本借兩位主人公帶我們快速遊覽東歐歷史的書。歷史背景有分量,卻沒有取代他們的感受。對剛剛進入作品的人來說,先記住誰離開了、誰仍然留在原處,往往比立刻把每段敘述對應到年代更重要。

同樣,森林也不宜只被當作一個方便的象徵。前面的木頭細節已經提醒我們,Lev有一套具體的注意方式。人在什麼地方工作,習慣用眼睛看什麼、用手辨認什麼,會進入他與世界相處的方法。

從這一點回看書名,林間空地帶來的吸引並不是一切都被照亮,而是可以短暫地看清一部分。周圍仍然有樹,有視線到不了的地方。用這樣的期待進入小說,也許比要求人物最終交出全部解釋更合適。

它邀請的是慢一點的閱讀

《林間空地》當然也可能使一些讀者感到不夠滿足。Eva Luber在Literaturzeitschrift.de的書評中,贊賞其中關於自然、山地和季節的語言,同時坦言,部分章首引語的意義難以把握;細節不斷增加,有些疑問卻沒有得到她期待的明確說明。

這個保留值得認真看待。留白並不會自動成為優點,正如解釋充分也不一定破壞文學。讀者會有不同的需要:有人喜歡一段關係保持難以歸類的狀態,有人則需要知道幾件關鍵事情究竟怎麼發生。

Wolff本人願意讓友情與愛情之間的邊界保持開放。在同一篇訪談裡,她也承認,自己並不掌握人物的所有秘密。這提示了一種閱讀約定:這部小說更在意接近一個人,不急於完成對他的說明。

如果你喜歡細微的動作、克制的語言,以及相識很久的人之間仍然存在的陌生感,這樣的約定很可能具有吸引力。若主要期待事件連續推進,或希望一段關係早早進入明確的愛情軌道,則需要調整預期。

英語讀者可以選擇Moth Books出版的Clearing,由Ruth Martin翻譯。Litrix另有以Glimmer of Light為題、Alexandra Roesch翻譯的展示選段,與這部正式英譯本不同。

對我來說,最願意帶進閱讀的仍是蘇黎世那張車票。一個連電車票都買得有些吃力的人,已經走到了很遠的地方。我們暫時只看見他的遲疑,卻不知道這次出發對他究竟有多難。

繼續往前翻,時間反而往後走。小說給人的機會,是在越來越認識Lev之後,再想起最初遇見他的那個站台。

Beyond this introduction读完这里,还可以去哪里讀完這裡,還可以去哪裡

This introduction draws on the authorized German and English selections from Litrix, the author's conversation with Laura Möndel, and the two attributed reviews. The Zurich scene comes from chapter eight; the selections are not the novel's continuous opening. The English guide is independently written. Moth Books' published translation is by Ruth Martin, distinct from Alexandra Roesch's Litrix sample.

参考Litrix提供的德文及英文授权选段、Laura Möndel的作者访谈与两篇署名书评。苏黎世场景来自第八章,选段并非连续开篇。正式英译本采用Moth Books公布的书名及译者信息;本文不以选段说明全书所有情节。

參考Litrix提供的德文及英文授權選段、Laura Möndel的作者訪談與兩篇署名書評。蘇黎世場景來自第八章,選段並非連續開篇。正式英譯本採用Moth Books公佈的書名及譯者資訊;本文不以選段說明全書所有情節。

The linked conversations, excerpts, and reviews may discuss more of the story than this introduction does.

外部访谈、试读与评论可能谈到本文尚未展开的情节。

外部訪談、試讀與評論可能談到本文尚未展開的情節。

Author conversation作者访谈作者訪談

Donaukurier · Laura Möndel interviews Iris Wolff

Wolff discusses reverse chronology, getting to know another person, and the openness of friendship and love.

作者谈逆向讲述、人与人相识的过程,以及友情与爱情之间的开放边界。

作者談逆向講述、人與人相識的過程,以及友情與愛情之間的開放邊界。

Read an excerpt公开试读公開試讀

Litrix · German selections

Authorized, non-contiguous passages from the German novel, including the Zurich reunion in chapter eight.

德文授权选段,包含第八章苏黎世重逢;并非连续开篇。

德文授權選段,包含第八章蘇黎世重逢;並非連續開篇。

Read an excerpt公开试读公開試讀

Litrix · English sample translation

Alexandra Roesch's selected sample, titled Glimmer of Light; not Ruth Martin's published English translation.

Alexandra Roesch翻译的展示选段,题为Glimmer of Light,不是Ruth Martin的正式英译本。

Alexandra Roesch翻譯的展示選段,題為Glimmer of Light,不是Ruth Martin的正式英譯本。

Publication details出版资料出版資料

Moth Books · Clearing

The published English edition of Lichtungen, translated by Ruth Martin.

Lichtungen的正式英译本Clearing,译者Ruth Martin。

Lichtungen的正式英譯本Clearing,譯者Ruth Martin。

Another reader’s view另一位读者的看法另一位讀者的看法

Litrix · Kristina Maidt-Zinke

A review of history, landscape and Wolff's prose, with original-edition details. Reveals more of the characters' past.

讨论历史、景物与语言,附原版书目信息;评论透露较多人物往事。

討論歷史、景物與語言,附原版書目資訊;評論透露較多人物往事。

Another reader’s view另一位读者的看法另一位讀者的看法

Literaturzeitschrift.de · Eva Luber

Appreciates the landscape writing while questioning some epigraphs and unresolved details.

赞赏景物描写,同时保留对部分章首引语及未解细节的疑问。

贊賞景物描寫,同時保留對部分章首引語及未解細節的疑問。