Non DubitoA Mind in Many Languages
Search搜索搜尋
EN

A place & its regulars地方与常客地方與常客

The Café with No Name: First, Get the Door Open

《无名咖啡馆》:店开起来了,名字还没有想好

《無名咖啡館》:店開起來了,名字還沒有想好

Robert Simon has a room to clean, a business to begin, and no satisfactory name for it. The neighborhood will bring the rest.

一间旧店,几张桌椅,几个尚未熟悉的人。西蒙先把门打开,店里的生活才会慢慢有自己的样子。

一間舊店,幾張桌椅,幾個尚未熟悉的人。西蒙先把門打開,店裡的生活才會慢慢有自己的樣子。

Original title原书名原書名: Das Café ohne Namen · German德语德語

罗伯特·泽塔勒 / Robert Seethaler · Original publication原作首版原作首版 · Claassen

Han Qin (秦汉) · Guide published导读发布導讀發佈

Introduces the preparations for opening the café and the starting points of its neighborhood relationships, leaving later developments and the café’s fate aside. The novel includes drinking, violence, psychological distress, and loss. The English translation is by Katy Derbyshire.

介绍开店的起点与街坊群像,保留主要关系的发展及咖啡馆的结局。作品含饮酒、暴力、精神困扰与失落,并非全程轻松的日常小品。已有刘秋叶译中文本,民主与建设出版社2025年出版;正式英译名为The Café with No Name,译者Katy Derbyshire。

介紹開店的起點與街坊群像,保留主要關係的發展及咖啡館的結局。作品含飲酒、暴力、精神困擾與失落,並非全程輕鬆的日常小品。已有劉秋葉譯中文本,民主與建設出版社2025年出版;正式英譯名為The Café with No Name,譯者Katy Derbyshire。

Robert Simon has rented an old café. Before it can become the place he imagines, there are walls to paint, floorboards to sand, and furniture to clean. He gets on with the work.

The name is less cooperative. He has considered it, but nothing feels right. For now, the café will have to open without one.

That is a pleasantly practical way into a title that could invite all sorts of symbolism. “No name” need not announce a profound mystery. A man is setting up a business, and one item on the list remains unfinished.

Robert Seethaler’s The Café with No Name, first published in German in 2023 and translated into English by Katy Derbyshire, begins with that kind of tangible ambition. Simon wants a place of his own. Other people will come into it with needs he has not anticipated. We can follow them through the door before deciding what the place represents.

Put the postcard away

The story begins in Vienna in 1966. Simon is thirty-one, earns his living doing odd jobs around the Karmelitermarkt, and lodges with a war widow. There is no distinguished career to explain, no famous identity waiting to be discovered beneath his ordinary appearance.

The German opening available through Vorablesen quickly gives the neighborhood physical substance. People work here. Things have to be carried, cleaned, and made ready for another day. Simon is already part of this activity before he imagines becoming a café proprietor.

Readers arriving with an idea of Vienna as an elegant conversation conducted over elaborate cakes may need to set it aside. This café belongs to a working neighborhood. Its appeal will not depend on a celebrated customer having once occupied a particular chair.

Nor does Simon need to meet a historical figure before his life becomes worth following. Wanting to run a small business is enough to bring change into it. The preparations introduce hope, expense, uncertainty, and a different relationship with people he already knows.

The work is important to that hope. A pleasant atmosphere can be imagined in an instant; a dirty floor cannot be made clean by the strength of the imagining. Seethaler’s opening lets the effort remain visible. The future establishment is still a room somebody must get ready.

Then the door has to open. People may come in, but they do not owe the proprietor satisfaction simply because he has tried hard. Keeping a business going involves other people’s judgments, habits, and willingness to return. That gives a modest enterprise plenty of room for a story.

The date also matters. This is not Vienna in the immediate aftermath of the ceasefire. More than twenty years have passed since the war ended. Its damage still shapes Simon’s life and the neighborhood, while new building and new expectations are changing the city. The novel chooses a small place within that change, rather than offering a comprehensive history of reconstruction.

Mila needs a job

Once the café begins to gather people, Simon can no longer be its only story.

Mila has lost her factory job. She comes looking for work and becomes his employee, though serving customers is new to her. Her initial difficulty is concrete: something she had expected to depend on no longer provides an income.

For Simon, hiring her is equally practical. There is work to be done. One person needs assistance; another needs wages. Their relationship can begin from those needs without being exhausted by them.

Writing in The Beijing News, critic Gong Zi draws attention to Mila’s lost expectation of secure work and the significance of the café for her. The observation gives warmth something firmer to stand on. Being offered a job cannot compensate for every disappointment, but it can change what tomorrow looks like.

Other people enter the café’s orbit, including the butcher, local workers, and the wrestler René. His connection with Mila becomes one of the novel’s relationship threads; its development is better left to the book.

Occupations help us recognize people quickly, but they are incomplete introductions. Someone may bring his working habits straight to the table or reveal a side that has little room elsewhere. We know how he spends part of his day before we know what to make of him.

This is one of the pleasures of a neighborhood novel. On a first appearance, a character may be little more than a name and a trade. When he returns, we remember an earlier remark. Expectations form. A complete biography is unnecessary for the reader to begin caring about the next visit.

Familiarity is not the same as harmony. A room that can accommodate different people will also accommodate their irritations. What is endearing at one moment may be exhausting at another, without anybody having undergone a dramatic change of personality.

Calling them all “goodhearted little people” in advance would make the experience thinner. It is more interesting to notice which people attract us, which make us uneasy, and when those responses shift. Simon need not supply our opinion of everyone he serves.

Company has limits

A café is almost a ready-made promise of comfort. We know the outline: strangers bring their disappointments inside, learn to understand one another, and leave better equipped for life.

There is genuine pleasure in company here, but relationships bring difficulties through the door as well. Drinking does not only relax people. Concern can coexist with misunderstanding. A busy room is no guarantee against loneliness.

That makes it worth resisting the impulse to turn Simon into a life coach disguised as a proprietor. He is running a business and living a life of his own. Caring about someone does not mean knowing what will help them, much less possessing the power to make their suffering stop.

In an interview with FOCUS, Seethaler says that status and reputation do not determine his interest in a person. He also discusses his working-class background and acknowledges having wanted to leave that environment.

The two observations belong together. Attention to an ordinary life does not require idealizing its conditions. A place can be worth writing about without being somewhere everyone should remain. Familiarity may include affection, impatience, and the desire to get away.

That is a useful freedom for the reader too. We can enjoy the café’s companionship without declaring older neighborhood life superior to everything that came after it. We can recognize the limits of warmth without pretending that a little company is worthless.

A café cannot hold the entirety of its customers’ lives. Fiction can nevertheless linger there long enough to give their apparently incidental encounters weight.

Comfort, or a familiar recipe?

The German opening offers an accessible route into the novel. Simon is walking, working, preparing the premises; pieces of his earlier life emerge alongside the person we are meeting now. We do not first have to memorize a family tree or learn a set of elaborate narrative rules.

The café itself provides an easily recognized center. People can leave and come back, and so can the reader. That steadiness is part of the attraction. It is also where a skeptical response begins.

In his review for Deutschlandfunk, Oliver Jungen acknowledges Seethaler’s storytelling skill while finding the mixture of nostalgia, emotion, and recognizable character types too expertly arranged. For Jungen, its fluency does not compensate for a lack of depth; the broader upheavals of the period also remain at a distance.

That is a substantial objection, not simply a refusal to enjoy something gentle. If you want a Vienna novel closely engaged with the political energies of the late 1960s, or a cast whose every return overturns your first impression, this may not be the book you are seeking.

Yet familiarity need not feel empty to every reader. Some will want to spend time with an episodic story because small encounters can accumulate into the texture of a lived year. It is possible to know that life is more complicated than a novel’s chosen room and still be interested in that room.

A useful expectation is neither a source of daily wisdom nor a definitive portrait of an era. Try the opening for its attention to work and the changing shape of an ordinary day. See whether you want to remain with the man who is making the place ready.

At the beginning, Simon has not found a name. We need not solve that for him by attaching a grand meaning to the café. Let the people arrive. They will give us more to go on.

罗伯特·西蒙租下了一间旧店面。他要开一家咖啡馆。

拿到钥匙以后,先得清理、刷墙、打磨地板和桌椅。这些事一件件做起来,比替未来设想一种美好的气氛更费力。至于店名,他想过,却一直没有想到满意的。

读到这里,“无名”还没有什么神秘含义。店主人只是在准备开门,有一项事情暂时没有办妥。

这个起点,很适合认识泽塔勒2023年出版的《无名咖啡馆》。它把一家小店放在维也纳的街坊生活里,让人陆续进来。有的人需要喝一杯,有的人需要工作,也有人还没想清楚自己需要什么。西蒙不必先知道他们的人生,才能把店开下去;读者也可以先跟着客人入座,不急着问这地方究竟象征了什么。

这不是明信片上的维也纳

故事从1966年开始。三十一岁的西蒙,在卡梅利特市场附近做杂活,租住在一位战争遗孀的家里。他没有令人称羡的履历,也没有一个等待旁人发现的显赫身份。

读这本书,不妨暂时放下对维也纳咖啡馆的惯常想象。这里不是靠名人往事、精致甜点与优雅谈吐吸引人的地方。市场在旁边,人要挣钱,要搬运东西,要把一天的活做完。后来走进来的,也主要是附近工作和生活的人。

泽塔勒并不需要先让西蒙与某件历史大事相遇,好证明这个普通人的日子值得讲。他想做自己的生意,愿意把一间旧店慢慢整理出来,故事就已经有了起点。

这件事的吸引力,也不在于他最终能否成为某种成功人士。开店会给他带来新的安排、新的担忧,以及原本未必会发生的相识。一个人的生活开始容纳更多别人,未必需要比这更大的开场。

Vorablesen提供的德文公开样章写到开业前夜,可以先读西蒙从市场干活到整理店面的这段过程。店还没有迎来新生活的热闹,日复一日的劳动已经使他的愿望有了形状。

等门真正打开,小店便要进入周围人的日常。供给并不奢华,客人也没有义务因为他很用心,就觉得什么都好。经营一家店的实际麻烦,与有人愿意再来的喜悦,会共同留在故事里。

这里的年代值得记清楚:战争已经结束二十多年。伤痕与匮乏仍然影响生活,但不能把1966年的维也纳直接想成刚刚停火的城市。小说选取的是一小片街区,不是要替整座城市写一部完整的重建史。

米拉需要一份工作,不是一个道理

随着咖啡馆开门,西蒙不再只是一个人的故事。

米拉原先在工厂工作,失业以后来到这里,后来成为店员。她没有做服务员的经验,却愿意试试。这个人物首先带进来的,是谋生的问题:原以为可以依赖的工作不再可靠,接下来怎么办?

对西蒙而言,接纳米拉也不是完成一次抽象的善举。小店有事情要做,一个人需要帮手,另一个人需要收入,他们由此开始相处。关系可以从这样的实际需要出发,并不因此只剩下交换。

宫子在《新京报》的评论中,注意到米拉失业前对稳定工作的期待,以及小店对她的意义。这个细节使故事里的温情有了重量:有人愿意给你一个位置,并不能补偿此前所有的失望,却可以使明天变得与今天不同。

之后,肉铺老板、附近的工人和其他街坊不断出现。摔跤手勒内也进入了咖啡馆的生活。他与米拉之间会发生什么,是小说的一条重要线索,但不必在介绍里提前交代。

这些人物的职业,使读者很快知道他们平常在做什么,却不能保证知道他们是什么样的人。在店里,他们可能显出工作时看不见的一面,也可能把白天的习惯与烦躁原封不动地带过来。

群像小说的乐趣,往往就在这种逐渐熟悉中。一个人第一次出现,我们只记得他的身份;等他再次到来,先前说过的话、做过的事就会跟着他一起进门。人物还没有获得完整的传记,读者已经开始对他有所期待。

不过,这种熟悉不是大家终于组成一个毫无隔阂的新家庭。一个地方容得下不同的人,并不意味着这些人天然合得来。有些人的可爱和难以忍受,甚至可能出自同一种脾气。

如果预先把每位客人都归入“失意但善良的小人物”,阅读很快就会变得单调。更有意思的是,看看自己什么时候愿意靠近某个人,什么时候又想离他远一点。西蒙的判断也未必需要成为我们的判断。

温暖可以存在,却不负责解决一切

咖啡馆这样的场所,很容易使人期待一种熟悉的阅读安慰:各有伤心事的人走进来,在相处中得到理解,最后带着重新生活的勇气出去。

《无名咖啡馆》确实提供相聚的愉快,也让关系中的困难进入店里。关心可能与误解挨得很近,饮酒不只使人松弛,孤独也不总能靠热闹消散。有人愿意照顾另一个人,不表示他已经知道该怎样照顾。

因此,不必把西蒙读成一位隐藏在柜台后面的人生导师。他在经营小店,也在过自己的生活。他会对人产生感情,会有所相信,读者可以与他一起关心这些人,同时保留自己的迟疑。

泽塔勒在接受FOCUS访谈时谈到,地位与声望并不决定一个人是否使他感兴趣。他来自工人家庭,但也坦言,自己曾经想离开那个环境。把两句话放在一起看,尤其有帮助。

他对普通生活的注意,不必被理解成对贫困的赞美。一个地方值得写,与一个人必须留在那里,并不是一回事。对某种生活足够熟悉,也可以同时意味着珍惜、厌烦,以及想走远一点。

这给阅读留下了一种比较松弛的态度。我们不需要因为喜欢小店里的相聚,就相信旧日街坊关系优于所有新的生活;也不需要因为知道温情有边界,就否认那一会儿有人相伴确实很好。

人的日子不能全部靠一间咖啡馆承担。但小说把目光停在这里,仍然可以让那些容易被当成琐事的相处,获得足够清楚的形状。

为什么有人喜欢,也有人觉得太熟悉

从德语公开试读看,泽塔勒很快就把人放进具体的动作里:走路、干活、整理店面。叙述也会从当下转回西蒙的早年。过去没有被集中做成一份人物档案,而是逐步与眼前这个人接上。

这种写法的进入门槛不高。读者不需要先理清一个庞大的家族谱系,或者适应不断变化的叙述规则。小店提供了一个容易认得的中心,离开一会儿,再跟着人物回来,仍然知道自己在哪里。

不过,容易亲近也可能成为它受到质疑的原因。Oliver Jungen在德国广播电台的评论中承认,泽塔勒很会讲故事,却批评小说对怀旧、情绪和人物类型的处理过于熟练,仿佛读者很容易知道自己接下来将怎样被打动。他也认为,小说与1960年代更广泛的政治变动保持了距离,流畅的讲述未必带来足够深入的人物。

这不只是拒绝一本容易读的书,而是一种值得认真对待的保留。若你希望每个人物都不断突破最初印象,或者期待一部紧贴那个时代社会变化的维也纳小说,这本书的选择可能会让你感到不够。

但熟悉感也不必自动等同于空洞。有些读者愿意把时间交给这样的叙述,不是因为不知道生活有更复杂的面向,而是想看看一些不够显眼的相识,怎样累积成一个人真实经过的日子。

可以先从开篇对劳动与日常的注意进入,看看自己愿不愿意留下来。它不必被当作随时可以翻出一句人生智慧的读物,也不必承担描绘整个时代的任务。几个人碰面,说几句话,各自带着未解决的事情离开,第二天仍然可能再来。

开店之初,西蒙没有想好名字。对于读者,也许暂时记住有这么一个人、这么一间店,已经足够。等人陆续来了,这地方会成为什么,再由他们的生活慢慢说。

羅伯特·西蒙租下了一間舊店面。他要開一家咖啡館。

拿到鑰匙以後,先得清理、刷牆、打磨地板和桌椅。這些事一件件做起來,比替未來設想一種美好的氣氛更費力。至於店名,他想過,卻一直沒有想到滿意的。

讀到這裡,「無名」還沒有什麼神秘含義。店主人只是在準備開門,有一項事情暫時沒有辦妥。

這個起點,很適合認識澤塔勒2023年出版的《無名咖啡館》。它把一家小店放在維也納的街坊生活裡,讓人陸續進來。有的人需要喝一杯,有的人需要工作,也有人還沒想清楚自己需要什麼。西蒙不必先知道他們的人生,才能把店開下去;讀者也可以先跟著客人入座,不急著問這地方究竟象徵了什麼。

這不是明信片上的維也納

故事從1966年開始。三十一歲的西蒙,在卡梅利特市場附近做雜活,租住在一位戰爭遺孀的家裡。他沒有令人稱羨的履歷,也沒有一個等待旁人發現的顯赫身份。

讀這本書,不妨暫時放下對維也納咖啡館的慣常想象。這裡不是靠名人往事、精緻甜點與優雅談吐吸引人的地方。市場在旁邊,人要掙錢,要搬運東西,要把一天的活做完。後來走進來的,也主要是附近工作和生活的人。

澤塔勒並不需要先讓西蒙與某件歷史大事相遇,好證明這個普通人的日子值得講。他想做自己的生意,願意把一間舊店慢慢整理出來,故事就已經有了起點。

這件事的吸引力,也不在於他最終能否成為某種成功人士。開店會給他帶來新的安排、新的擔憂,以及原本未必會發生的相識。一個人的生活開始容納更多別人,未必需要比這更大的開場。

Vorablesen提供的德文公開樣章寫到開業前夜,可以先讀西蒙從市場乾活到整理店面的這段過程。店還沒有迎來新生活的熱鬧,日復一日的勞動已經使他的願望有了形狀。

等門真正打開,小店便要進入周圍人的日常。供給並不奢華,客人也沒有義務因為他很用心,就覺得什麼都好。經營一家店的實際麻煩,與有人願意再來的喜悅,會共同留在故事裡。

這裡的年代值得記清楚:戰爭已經結束二十多年。傷痕與匱乏仍然影響生活,但不能把1966年的維也納直接想成剛剛停火的城市。小說選取的是一小片街區,不是要替整座城市寫一部完整的重建史。

米拉需要一份工作,不是一個道理

隨著咖啡館開門,西蒙不再只是一個人的故事。

米拉原先在工廠工作,失業以後來到這裡,後來成為店員。她沒有做服務員的經驗,卻願意試試。這個人物首先帶進來的,是謀生的問題:原以為可以依賴的工作不再可靠,接下來怎麼辦?

對西蒙而言,接納米拉也不是完成一次抽象的善舉。小店有事情要做,一個人需要幫手,另一個人需要收入,他們由此開始相處。關係可以從這樣的實際需要出發,並不因此只剩下交換。

宮子在《新京報》的評論中,注意到米拉失業前對穩定工作的期待,以及小店對她的意義。這個細節使故事裡的溫情有了重量:有人願意給你一個位置,並不能補償此前所有的失望,卻可以使明天變得與今天不同。

之後,肉鋪老闆、附近的工人和其他街坊不斷出現。摔跤手勒內也進入了咖啡館的生活。他與米拉之間會發生什麼,是小說的一條重要線索,但不必在介紹裡提前交代。

這些人物的職業,使讀者很快知道他們平常在做什麼,卻不能保證知道他們是什麼樣的人。在店裡,他們可能顯出工作時看不見的一面,也可能把白天的習慣與煩躁原封不動地帶過來。

群像小說的樂趣,往往就在這種逐漸熟悉中。一個人第一次出現,我們只記得他的身份;等他再次到來,先前說過的話、做過的事就會跟著他一起進門。人物還沒有獲得完整的傳記,讀者已經開始對他有所期待。

不過,這種熟悉不是大家終於組成一個毫無隔閡的新家庭。一個地方容得下不同的人,並不意味著這些人天然合得來。有些人的可愛和難以忍受,甚至可能出自同一種脾氣。

如果預先把每位客人都歸入「失意但善良的小人物」,閱讀很快就會變得單調。更有意思的是,看看自己什麼時候願意靠近某個人,什麼時候又想離他遠一點。西蒙的判斷也未必需要成為我們的判斷。

溫暖可以存在,卻不負責解決一切

咖啡館這樣的場所,很容易使人期待一種熟悉的閱讀安慰:各有傷心事的人走進來,在相處中得到理解,最後帶著重新生活的勇氣出去。

《無名咖啡館》確實提供相聚的愉快,也讓關係中的困難進入店裡。關心可能與誤解挨得很近,飲酒不只使人鬆弛,孤獨也不總能靠熱鬧消散。有人願意照顧另一個人,不表示他已經知道該怎樣照顧。

因此,不必把西蒙讀成一位隱藏在櫃台後面的人生導師。他在經營小店,也在過自己的生活。他會對人產生感情,會有所相信,讀者可以與他一起關心這些人,同時保留自己的遲疑。

澤塔勒在接受FOCUS訪談時談到,地位與聲望並不決定一個人是否使他感興趣。他來自工人家庭,但也坦言,自己曾經想離開那個環境。把兩句話放在一起看,尤其有幫助。

他對普通生活的注意,不必被理解成對貧困的贊美。一個地方值得寫,與一個人必須留在那裡,並不是一回事。對某種生活足夠熟悉,也可以同時意味著珍惜、厭煩,以及想走遠一點。

這給閱讀留下了一種比較鬆弛的態度。我們不需要因為喜歡小店裡的相聚,就相信舊日街坊關係優於所有新的生活;也不需要因為知道溫情有邊界,就否認那一會兒有人相伴確實很好。

人的日子不能全部靠一間咖啡館承擔。但小說把目光停在這裡,仍然可以讓那些容易被當成瑣事的相處,獲得足夠清楚的形狀。

為什麼有人喜歡,也有人覺得太熟悉

從德語公開試讀看,澤塔勒很快就把人放進具體的動作裡:走路、乾活、整理店面。敘述也會從當下轉回西蒙的早年。過去沒有被集中做成一份人物檔案,而是逐步與眼前這個人接上。

這種寫法的進入門檻不高。讀者不需要先理清一個龐大的家族譜系,或者適應不斷變化的敘述規則。小店提供了一個容易認得的中心,離開一會兒,再跟著人物回來,仍然知道自己在哪裡。

不過,容易親近也可能成為它受到質疑的原因。Oliver Jungen在德國廣播電台的評論中承認,澤塔勒很會講故事,卻批評小說對懷舊、情緒和人物類型的處理過於熟練,彷彿讀者很容易知道自己接下來將怎樣被打動。他也認為,小說與1960年代更廣泛的政治變動保持了距離,流暢的講述未必帶來足夠深入的人物。

這不只是拒絕一本容易讀的書,而是一種值得認真對待的保留。若你希望每個人物都不斷突破最初印象,或者期待一部緊貼那個時代社會變化的維也納小說,這本書的選擇可能會讓你感到不夠。

但熟悉感也不必自動等同於空洞。有些讀者願意把時間交給這樣的敘述,不是因為不知道生活有更複雜的面向,而是想看看一些不夠顯眼的相識,怎樣累積成一個人真實經過的日子。

可以先從開篇對勞動與日常的注意進入,看看自己願不願意留下來。它不必被當作隨時可以翻出一句人生智慧的讀物,也不必承擔描繪整個時代的任務。幾個人碰面,說幾句話,各自帶著未解決的事情離開,第二天仍然可能再來。

開店之初,西蒙沒有想好名字。對於讀者,也許暫時記住有這麼一個人、這麼一間店,已經足夠。等人陸續來了,這地方會成為什麼,再由他們的生活慢慢說。

Beyond this introduction读完这里,还可以去哪里讀完這裡,還可以去哪裡

Close discussion follows the publisher’s German sample hosted by Vorablesen, which ends on the evening before opening. Publisher information and Gong Zi’s review introduce later characters only at their starting points. Seethaler’s FOCUS interview and Jungen’s Deutschlandfunk review provide contrasting perspectives. The date is the German original’s publication, not that of Katy Derbyshire’s English translation or Liu Qiuye’s Chinese translation.

开篇语言与场景观察以Vorablesen提供的出版社德文样章为基础,样章止于开业前夜;出版介绍与宫子书评补充后续人物的出场起点。FOCUS作者访谈与Jungen的德国广播电台评论提供不同阅读角度。日期为德语原作首版;刘秋叶中文译本资料见《新京报》,Katy Derbyshire正式英译本资料见Europa Editions。

開篇語言與場景觀察以Vorablesen提供的出版社德文樣章為基礎,樣章止於開業前夜;出版介紹與宮子書評補充後續人物的出場起點。FOCUS作者訪談與Jungen的德國廣播電台評論提供不同閱讀角度。日期為德語原作首版;劉秋葉中文譯本資料見《新京報》,Katy Derbyshire正式英譯本資料見Europa Editions。

The linked conversations, excerpts, and reviews may discuss more of the story than this introduction does.

外部访谈、试读与评论可能谈到本文尚未展开的情节。

外部訪談、試讀與評論可能談到本文尚未展開的情節。

Author conversation作者访谈作者訪談

FOCUS — Robert Seethaler访谈 / Interview

Marika Schaertl interviews Seethaler about ordinary people, status, and his working-class background. German.

Marika Schaertl访谈作者,谈普通人、地位以及自己的工人家庭背景。德语。

Marika Schaertl訪談作者,談普通人、地位以及自己的工人家庭背景。德語。

Read an excerpt公开试读公開試讀

Claassen / Vorablesen — 德文试读 / German sample

Original-edition information and a 27-page publisher sample, ending on the evening before the café opens; choose “Leseprobe als PDF.”

原版书目与27页出版社样章,止于开业前夜;点击“Leseprobe als PDF”阅读。

原版書目與27頁出版社樣章,止於開業前夜;點擊「Leseprobe als PDF」閱讀。

Publication details出版资料出版資料

Europa Editions — The Café with No Name

Official English edition and Katy Derbyshire’s translation.

正式英文版书目与Katy Derbyshire译者资料。

正式英文版書目與Katy Derbyshire譯者資料。

Publication details出版资料出版資料

Ullstein / Claassen — 德文书目 / German edition

Publisher’s description and author information. This page is for the later paperback, not the April 2023 first edition.

出版社故事介绍与作者资料;此页为后出的平装版,不与2023年4月首版日期混用。

出版社故事介紹與作者資料;此頁為後出的平裝版,不與2023年4月首版日期混用。

Another reader’s view另一位读者的看法另一位讀者的看法

新京报 — 宫子书评 / Gong Zi’s review

Chinese-edition information and a reading of Mila’s work and the café’s everyday consolations. Discusses later relationships and events.

中文版书目与米拉工作的解读,讨论小店的日常慰藉;涉及后续关系与人物遭遇。

中文版書目與米拉工作的解讀,討論小店的日常慰藉;涉及後續關係與人物遭遇。

Another reader’s view另一位读者的看法另一位讀者的看法

Deutschlandfunk — Oliver Jungen书评 / Review

Three-page review manuscript, “Grantlers Paradies,” dated June 23, 2023: skilled entertainment, nostalgia, and reservations about character depth. German; includes spoilers.

2023年6月23日书评原稿“Grantlers Paradies”,三页PDF,肯定叙述技巧,也质疑怀旧与人物深度。德语;含剧透。

2023年6月23日書評原稿「Grantlers Paradies」,三頁PDF,肯定敘述技巧,也質疑懷舊與人物深度。德語;含劇透。