Edition note: An independent English rewriting for readers of The Lives of Others. It preserves the Chinese argument while reorganizing its sequence for an English-language essay. Full-film spoilers.
At a reception after a theatrical premiere, Culture Minister Bruno Hempf watches Christa-Maria Sieland. She is the leading actor and the partner of playwright Georg Dreyman. Hempf wants her. Dreyman is in the way.
The minister suggests that the writer should be investigated.
There is no evidence against Dreyman. He is one of the German Democratic Republic's approved artists, regularly produced and apparently loyal. His very cleanliness becomes an accusation: perhaps a man with no visible offense is simply hiding it well.
Grubitz understands the real reason and accepts the assignment because success may advance his career. Wiesler had independently found Dreyman's spotless profile suspicious and initially approaches the operation as genuine counterintelligence. Their motives differ, but the microphones do not.
This convergence is one of the film's sharpest observations. Institutions do not have to choose between true believers and cynics. Ambition can authorize a task; conviction can execute it; private lust can disappear into a document labeled security.
In the attic above Dreyman's apartment, Wiesler hears meals, jokes, arguments, sex, rehearsals, and friendships. The intimate life beneath him is nothing like the enemy structure his training prepared him to decode.
Then director Albert Jerska dies by suicide.
Jerska had been barred from working for years without an open trial that could be answered. For Dreyman's birthday he leaves a score titled “Sonata for a Good Man.” After the call announcing Jerska's death, Dreyman sits at the piano and plays it.
Wiesler listens through his headphones and cries.
To say that art “converts” Wiesler would make the scene both prettier and shallower. Music does not erase a political education in a few measures.
By then, evidence has accumulated against the worldview organizing his work. He knows the minister's private motive. He has seen Christa enter Hempf's car. He has heard how the ban has emptied Jerska's life. He knows Grubitz would welcome guilt because guilt is useful to a career. He has spent night after night translating a recognizable human household into surveillance prose.
The sonata gives those observations a moment in which they can no longer remain separate. It does not tell Wiesler what to do. It makes his existing way of listening impossible to sustain without remainder.
The first changes are small. He takes a volume of Brecht from Dreyman's apartment and reads it at home. Later, in a bar, he approaches Christa before she is due to meet Hempf. Calling himself a member of her audience, he tells her that she is a great artist and need not submit in order to become what she already is.
She goes home.
The encounter is not pure rescue. Wiesler possesses knowledge Christa never consented to give him, and he intervenes while concealing who he is. Even benevolent use of surveillance remains use of stolen access.
But something has changed in its direction. Until then, Wiesler's skill moved private life upward into the institution. In the bar, he uses what he knows to return one possibility to the person from whom the knowledge was taken.
He does not announce a new creed. He continues filing reports. The book and the conversation are minor deviations that could still be explained away.
Their significance is that no procedure required them. For the first time, Wiesler's attention is not fully owned by his role. He reads because he wants to read. He speaks because he sees someone about to be reduced to the minister's access and the state's permission to perform.
The decisive act comes later. Dreyman plans to publish an anonymous article on the GDR's suppressed suicide statistics. Wiesler hears every detail—and begins to write reports about something else.
版本说明:中文原作;简体与繁体同页切换。片名、人名、关键情节与过强措辞已作校订。全片剧透。
一场首演之后的酒会。文化部长站在人群中间端着酒杯,他刚看完那出戏,说了几句场面话。
他的目光落在女主角身上。她叫克里斯塔,是这个国家最好的舞台演员之一,也是那位剧作家的伴侣。部长走过去说了几句话,她笑着应付。
后来部长把负责这一片的国安部门主管叫到一边,说他觉得那位剧作家不太可靠,应该查一查。
那位剧作家叫德莱曼。上一篇写过:他是这个国家最受认可的作家之一,戏在国家剧院上演,书公开出版,从来没有被列入过黑名单。没有任何材料显示他有问题。
而部长要查他,理由说得很含糊——大意是这种人表面上没问题,恰恰说明藏得深。真实的理由是:部长想要那个女演员,而这个男人碍事。
格鲁比茨接下这个任务的时候心里很清楚这是怎么回事。片中有一场戏,他和部长在车里说话,两个人都没有说破,而两个人都明白。他要的是升迁,这一点他自己也不藏:有一场戏他跟维斯勒说,办好这个案子对我们两个都有好处;他还提到,如果德莱曼真的有问题,那"就更好了"。
"更好"这个词很要紧。 它的意思是:一个作家有没有问题,对格鲁比茨来说不是一个需要查清楚的事实,而是一个对他的仕途更有利或者更不利的结果。
而维斯勒接下它的时候,理由完全不同。有一场戏是这两个人在剧院看那出戏,维斯勒看完,跟格鲁比茨说他觉得应该查一查这个人——他说的理由是职业性的:这个人太干净了。他是真的这么想的。
上一篇写过:他相信这套东西。他相信这个国家有敌人,相信自己的工作是找出敌人,相信自己在保护什么东西。所以他接下这个任务,是因为他认为这是一件应该做的事。
这一处对照是这部电影最锋利的地方之一。格鲁比茨执行这套东西,是因为它能带来好处;维斯勒执行这套东西,是因为他相信它是对的。两个人做的事情一模一样——同一份任务书,同一套设备,同一份报告格式,从外面看不出任何区别。而它们的差别,在这部电影后面会决定两个人的全部走向。
维斯勒住进了那间阁楼,八小时一班,戴着耳机,面前一台打字机。他听到的东西,是一对普通伴侣的日常:吃饭,吵架,说笑话,谈工作,做爱,睡觉。他记录,归档,上报。而他也在听别的东西。
德莱曼有一个朋友叫耶斯卡,是导演。耶斯卡上了黑名单,七年没有工作了——这七年里他什么都不能做:不能排戏,不能发表,不能出国,甚至不能在正经场合露面。他没有被抓,没有被判刑,没有被指控任何具体的事,他只是被从名单上划掉了。
德莱曼过生日那天,耶斯卡来了,带来一份礼物,是一叠手抄的乐谱,曲名叫《献给好人的奏鸣曲》。他把乐谱递过去,说了几句话,然后走了。几天以后,耶斯卡在家里上吊了。
阁楼上的维斯勒听见了那场生日聚会,听见了耶斯卡说话的声音,也听见了后来那个告诉德莱曼耶斯卡死了的电话。接着他听见德莱曼走到钢琴前面,把那份乐谱打开,开始弹。
德莱曼弹完之后说了一句话,大意是:列宁说过,他不敢再听贝多芬的《热情》,因为听了以后他就没办法把革命进行到底了。他说,一个人如果真的听进去了这样的音乐,还能是个坏人吗?
镜头切到阁楼。维斯勒戴着耳机坐在那里,他在哭。
这是这部电影最容易被读浅的一处。如果原因是那段音乐,那么这个故事就变成了一个关于艺术之力量的抒情故事,而片子给的材料比这个复杂。
请把维斯勒在这段时间里知道的事情排一遍。他知道这次行动的真实原因——有一场戏,他在电梯里遇到那位女演员,也看见部长的车停在楼下等她,他后来查了那份任务的来龙去脉。他知道耶斯卡的事:一个导演,七年不能工作,没有罪名,然后自杀。他知道自己的上级要什么:格鲁比茨说过那句"如果他真的有问题就更好了"。他还知道自己每天记录的是什么:一对伴侣的私生活,逐时逐分。
那段音乐不是一个原因,它是一个时刻。 在那个时刻之前,维斯勒手里已经攒了一堆东西,这些东西各自都不足以改变什么——而它们凑在了一起。
改变不是从一个宣言开始的,是从两件小事开始的。
第一件:他从德莱曼家里偷了一本书。那是一本布莱希特,他趁人不在进屋,拿走,带回自己的公寓,躺在沙发上读。这是他第一次做一件跟任务无关的事。
第二件:他去了一家酒吧。那天克里斯塔一个人坐在那里喝酒,她正要去见部长——她被逼着做这件事,因为她需要那些药,因为她需要继续演戏。维斯勒走过去坐下,说的意思大致是:他是她的观众,他看过她的戏,她是一位了不起的演员;她不需要出卖自己,因为她本来就已经是了。他说:你要相信你自己。
她站起来,回家了。她推开门,德莱曼在,她抱住他。而这两个人都不知道刚才发生了什么。
偷一本书,和在酒吧里说几句话——这两件事都很小,却已经越出了纪律的边界:偷取监听对象的私人物品、私下接触目标,都不是无关紧要的行为;只是与后来伪造报告相比,后果尚未完全展开。而它们有一个共同点:都不在流程里。
上一篇写过,维斯勒做的每一件事都是岗位要求他做的,而这两件不是。没有一条规定要求他去读那本书,没有一条规定要求他走进那家酒吧,更没有一条规定要求他对一个被监听的对象说"你要相信你自己"。
而到这一步为止,他并没有做任何一件严重的事:他偷了一本书,也凭借窃听得来的信息接触目标;善意没有洗掉这种越界,只是他第一次把偷来的注意力用于归还一种可能,而不是继续上报。他的报告还是照常在写,照常在交。真正的那一步,还没有迈出去。
本文所依据的版本为二〇〇六年弗洛里安·亨克尔·冯·多纳斯马尔克执导版。