李白,从来没有落过地
Li Bai, He Never Touched the Ground
一、谪仙人
天宝元年,742年。李白四十出头。他终于等到玄宗召见,进入长安的宫廷生活。
贺知章称他为“谪仙人”。这不只见于后来的传记;李白《对酒忆贺监》的序也回忆,在长安紫极宫初见时,贺知章这样叫他,还解下金龟换酒。同代人的赞叹,后来长成了覆盖他一生的形象。
谪仙人。不是诗圣,不是诗佛。是从天上谪到人间的仙人。这个名字不解释一个人的全部,却准确抓住了读诗时的一种感觉:声音到了这里,来处仿佛还在天外。
前面写杜甫,我们看见现实怎样不断进入诗。读李白,常常先听见另一种力量:句子忽然起飞,官阶、路程、日常的尺度一下子跟不上了。
如果借本系列的“凿”与“构”来说,杜甫让人看见成形的压力,李白让人想到成形之前的涌动。同样是才华,也同样需要劳动,读来却有不同的重心。
庄子笔下的混沌,暂且成为这个形象的名字。李白的诗有时把我们带到分类还没有站稳的地方,仿佛声音比名字先到。
二、来历不明
李白的家世和出生地,确有未定的问题。
他与早期传记材料都把家族系于陇西李氏,李阳冰《草堂集序》又称他为凉武昭王李暠九世孙。祖先的故事传下来了,其中却仍有我们无法独立核实的环节。
出生地有碎叶与蜀地等说法,他在蜀中成长则较为确定。家族经商、商籍妨碍应举,也曾被用来解释他的经历,但这些问题至今仍有争论。
来处的某些细节隐在雾里,家庭、故乡和牵挂却并没有因此消失。我们不知道他的全部,不等于他没有属于自己的地方。
杜甫的士人家世与“致君尧舜上”的抱负,给他的诗提供了一个鲜明方向。战争、饥饿、亲人的离散,却又让这种忧虑远远超出仕途本身。一个人的苦,不是一份任命就能填平的。
李白同样想有所作为。他写信求荐,向往功业,也与道士交游、接受道箓,在朝廷和山水之间往返。入世与出世,都曾真正牵动他。
他的自由,不必来自“无根”。更动人的可能是:已经有牵挂、有愿望、有位置,却仍不肯让一个位置把自己说尽。
三、仰天大笑出门去
742至744年,李白在宫廷前后约两年。这段经历的开头,是希望。
出发的心情,在《南陵别儿童入京》里留下了一声大笑:
仰天大笑出门去,我辈岂是蓬蒿人。
诗中先有儿女牵衣,再有“余亦辞家西入秦”。按通常的系年,他正应召西去,奔向长安。笑声里有获用的盼望,有终于不必埋没草野的意气。
门仍然打开,笑声仍然响。只是他正走向自己后来会失望的地方。知道这一点,诗没有变小,反而多了命运尚未揭晓的亮度。
到了长安,他供奉翰林,得以接近皇帝,却没有获得宰辅那样的行政权力。李阳冰说他被问以国政、参与起草诏诰;传记也记载应命作诗。他所期待的政治施展,与实际获得的宫廷位置,并不重合。
“云想衣裳花想容,春风拂槛露华浓。”《清平调》使花、云与美人相互映照。杨贵妃、沉香亭、醉中作诗、高力士脱靴,后来在不同记述中汇成宫廷故事。细节有异,受赏识与不合拍的张力却始终在场。
后来是“赐金放还”。李阳冰写同列谗毁、皇帝疏远;《新唐书》又写他求还山。来时的大笑,终于走到了失意的离开。宫廷没有容下他的全部愿望。
杜甫《奉赠韦左丞丈二十二韵》写“骑驴十三载”,继而是“旅食京华春。朝扣富儿门,暮随肥马尘”。这是另一种求仕困顿的声音。李白入京的明亮,与杜甫求荐的低回,各有处境,也各有未被回应的愿望。
而李白也有“安能摧眉折腰事权贵,使我不得开心颜”。《梦游天姥吟留别》末尾的这声拒绝,与入京时的大笑放在一起,才看得见求用与不肯屈身之间的张力。
现实更没有放过晚年的他。安史之乱中,756年末至757年初,他进入永王李璘幕府;永王与肃宗政权冲突败亡后,李白受牵连入狱,后来被判长流夜郎。759年,他在途中遇赦,未到流放目的地。
他有判断,有选择,也承担了后果。诗里的轻与人生的重,就这样同时留在一个人身上。
因此,李白与杜甫的不同,不是一个想做官、一个从不想做官。更像是面对愿望与现实的距离,他们让语言采取了不同的姿态。
四、将进酒
《将进酒》沿用乐府旧题,是李白最著名的饮酒诗之一。先把常见传本的全篇读完,让那股水势从开头一直涌到末尾。
君不见黄河之水天上来,奔流到海不复回。
君不见高堂明镜悲白发,朝如青丝暮成雪。
人生得意须尽欢,莫使金樽空对月。
天生我材必有用,千金散尽还复来。
烹羊宰牛且为乐,会须一饮三百杯。
岑夫子,丹丘生,将进酒,杯莫停。
与君歌一曲,请君为我倾耳听。
钟鼓馔玉不足贵,但愿长醉不愿醒。
古来圣贤皆寂寞,唯有饮者留其名。
陈王昔时宴平乐,斗酒十千恣欢谑。
主人何为言少钱,径须沽取对君酌。
五花马,千金裘,呼儿将出换美酒,与尔同销万古愁。
“天生我材必有用”——读到这里,我们可以听见超出一份任命的自我肯定:我的价值不全由朝廷核准。愿意把它叫作一种存在的宣言,也未尝不可。那声音要先为自己站住,同时仍盼着自己的才华能够进入世界。
“古来圣贤皆寂寞”紧接着饮者留名,随后又把曹植这位陈王请入酒席。夸张、愤激、自负与失意搅在一起。诗把寻常的价值秩序翻了一个身:平日尊贵的变轻了,杯中之物却忽然重得足以抵住千古。
“万古愁”把杯中之物推到时间的尺度:河水不返,黑发成雪,人的一生转眼而过。三百杯、千金裘也在这样的尺度里发光。豪放不是没有悲哀,而是悲哀涨得太满,声音索性也涨大了。
杜甫说“穷年忧黎元”,我们容易听见饥寒、征役与眼前的人;李白说“与尔同销万古愁”,我们容易听见流逝本身。一个把镜头推向人间,一个忽然拉到宇宙——这是两种重音,不是互相禁止的题材。李白也写战争和百姓,杜甫也向天地发问。
还有“与尔”:他在叫朋友一起喝。宇宙之愁,并没有把席间的人取消。那奔向无限的声音,仍然需要一个听者。
五、月
月亮是李白诗中反复回来的亲密意象。它可以很远,也可以近到床前。
床前明月光,疑是地上霜。
举头望明月,低头思故乡。
这是《静夜思》今天广泛传诵的版本;早期传本另有“看月光”“望山月”。许多孩子从这四句开始遇见唐诗。抬头,低头,一个很小的动作,忽然让远处的故乡进入此刻。
他在蜀中成长,有家人,也有不同阶段的居所。“故乡”没有在诗里化成一份精确地址,反而给许多人的乡愁留下了位置。我们还可以顺着月光想得更远,想到一个仿佛不在地上的归处。那是诗向读者打开的另一条路。
举杯邀明月,对影成三人。
《月下独酌》让一个人、一轮月和一个影子凑成酒席。紧接着却说“月既不解饮,影徒随我身”。诗人没有忘记月不会喝酒。恰是知道这场陪伴的限度,宴会才既热闹又寂寞。
今人不见古时月,今月曾经照古人。
《把酒问月》借同一轮月亮让今人与古人相遇。人在更替,月仍挂在那里,诗把这段漫长递到眼前。与杜甫为天下寒士求广厦的声音并听,一种面向人群,一种把人放进长久时间;两者都从人的有限出发。
后来,传说替他安排了一个与月有关的结局:醉后乘舟,伸手去捞水中的月影,落水而死。更接近他生命终点的李阳冰,却在762年的序里留下病重、枕上授稿的记录。水中的月亮属于传说;病榻与待整理的诗稿,留下了另一种安静。
但传说为什么留了下来?因为它把读者熟悉的月、酒、水和无法握住的东西,收进了同一个画面。他伸向的不是月亮,是倒影。这个画面可以解释后人的想象,不能替代那个真实患病、需要照料的人。
六、他和杜甫
744年,通常认为在洛阳,李白与杜甫相遇。按传统虚岁,一个四十四,一个三十三。此后他们有过共同出游,745年又在齐鲁相聚。
闻一多后来把这次相会比作太阳与月亮相遇。隔着漫长的岁月,文学史家依然为这一刻惊叹。
与高适同行的梁宋之游,随后在齐鲁的相聚,留下寻访、饮酒、谈诗与问道的踪迹。杜甫《赠李白》的“痛饮狂歌空度日,飞扬跋扈为谁雄”,让我们听见一位友人眼里的飞扬,也听见其中的追问。
然后,他们分开了。共同生活的时间有限,写在诗里的回声却很长。
“故人入我梦,明我长相忆。”
“冠盖满京华,斯人独憔悴。”
“千秋万岁名,寂寞身后事。”
杜甫《梦李白》中的这些句子,不只仰望诗才,也忧虑朋友的遭际。千秋之名不能替活着的人挡风。杜甫看见的不只是仙人,还有一个可能在风波中失足的人。
李白留下的赠杜诗较少,但数量不能称量感情。《沙丘城下寄杜甫》写“思君若汶水,浩荡寄南征”;《鲁郡东石门送杜二甫》问“何时石门路,重有金樽开”。想念如水,盼着重开酒席,并不冷淡。
另有传为李白的《戏赠杜甫》:
饭颗山头逢杜甫,顶戴笠子日卓午。
借问别来太瘦生,总为从前作诗苦。
这首诗的归属和字句自古有争议。它把作诗之苦化成朋友间的打趣,留给后人一个正午戴笠、相逢问瘦的画面。幽默与亲近可以在这里被听见,至于两人各自的辛苦,都比这四句更长。
杜甫说“白也诗无敌,飘然思不群”,确有钦敬。李白诗里的怀念也有自己的重量。留下来的文字并不对称,不等于两个人只能是崇拜者与被崇拜者。
后世把他们并称“李杜”。若画成两笔,一个飞,一个走;一个让语言腾起,一个让语言承重。画法鲜明,却不能让任何一人只剩这一面。
宋代杨万里的论诗,经《诗人玉屑》等书传下“李神于诗,杜圣于诗”的评语。一边仿佛御风而行,一边仿佛载道而来,这是不同的艺术境界。
最好的诗,有时让劳动看起来消失。看起来消失,不等于劳动没有发生。
七、混沌本身在说话
现在可以重新说李白在这个系列里的位置。
本系列常用凿与构,描写人怎样拆开现成答案,又怎样建立可以居住的世界。现在,把此前那些身影再放到一起。
苏格拉底追问知识,孔子追问仁与礼,老子让名字迟疑,庄子让固定界限松动。康德划界,尼采持锤,王阳明转向内心;释迦牟尼追问执著,耶稣在受难中仍指向给予。
哥德尔揭示形式系统的限度,爱因斯坦改变物理的时空图景;杜甫让现实进入诗,荷马所代表的史诗传统使声音走向文字。秦始皇集中权力,华盛顿放下权力,亚历山大不断向外征服。
达尔文研究生命的变化,牛顿以运动定律和引力描述世界,巴赫织起声部,贝多芬在失聪后继续创作,司马迁在极辱之后继续著史。这些只是此前人物的剪影,不能用一个动词代替他们的一生。
李白是否不在这张清单里?
历史中的李白当然也在。他读书,沿用并改造乐府旧题,选择字句,经营人际关系,进入宫廷,又遭遇政治风暴。他既构造诗,也被现实改变。
但是读他的某些句子时,我们先感到的不是工具留下的痕迹,而是水突然涌出来。仿佛形式尚未关门,黄河已经从天上奔下。
这里的“在凿之前”,是一种读诗的惊讶:明明有一字一句的安排,迎面来的却像没有被安排过的水。
庄子混沌的寓言提醒人注意凿孔的代价;李白的飞扬,让我们想象一个暂时不被固定的声音。两幅不同的图景,在阅读中彼此照亮。
“天生我材必有用”也可以这样再听一次:在别人给我排定用途之前,我已经开口。但开口以后,声音仍要借助语言、古诗和听者,才成为作品。
也许工夫恰在这里:旧题承住了声音,句子的运动却出人意料。河流不必没有两岸,才让我们感到它的力量。
若仍愿意说“混沌本身在说话”,请把它听成读者面对诗时的一声惊叹。不是天才没有做工,而是工夫终于让我们听见了仿佛未被做过的东西。
八、飞
再回到本系列想象的桥上。
桥头多了一个人。但他没有站在桥头。他在桥的上方,在飞。
秦始皇脚下有裂缝,华盛顿脚下是泥土。贝多芬握着拳头,司马迁背微微弯着,杜甫穿着破袖子。每一种姿态,都带着此前篇章的回声。
李白不站。李白飞。
我们把诗的轻交给他。他飞过桥面、泥土与裂缝,飞过众人的头顶。不是站得比谁更高,而是有一个声音,忽然换了行走的方式。
他往下看,看到杜甫在走。一起飞吧。
但杜甫还背着“安得广厦千万间”的愿望。仁不是惩罚他的钉子,而是他不肯放下的牵挂。李白也有牵挂,只是此刻,他的声音比重量先走了一步。
于是飞也显出代价。月亮像朋友,影子像伙伴,酒使声音升高;但月亮不答,影子不能伸手扶人,酒醒之后,身体还要回到地面。
他显得那么自由,也那么孤独。而在人生的路上,他也曾被另一个人走近。
杜甫的寂寞里有人间尚未被听见的苦,李白的寂寞里有无法同飞的距离。两种寂寞之间,他们曾经一起走过路,也曾为对方写诗。
“举杯邀明月,对影成三人。”孤独并没有封住他,反而催他向一个还没有回答的对象发出邀请。
自由在这里不是没有关系。是关系尚不能满足一个人的时候,他仍然向外伸出手。
桥头站满了人:有的站着,有的弯着腰,有的握着拳,有的身影已经淡去。天空里,有一个人拿着杯子。
他往下看,看到了所有人。然后往上看,看到了月亮。
他选了月亮。
注释
年代采用通常的701—762年。按此计算,742年约四十一周岁、虚岁四十二;744年李白虚岁四十四、杜甫虚岁三十三。出生地点、家族迁徙、族属与商人背景没有同等程度的确定性,本文不由其中一项推定其余各项。两《唐书》也包含相互不合及受传记编纂影响的叙述,参看Nienhauser对《旧唐书》李白传的分析。 李陽冰:《唐李翰林草堂集序》;《新唐書》卷202:李白傳;《舊唐書》卷190下:李白與杜甫;William H. Nienhauser Jr.:《舊唐書》李白傳的讀法(2002)。
“谪仙人”可与李白《对酒忆贺监》诗序相互核对;《新唐书》记“子,谪仙人也”。翰林经历结合李阳冰《草堂集序》与史传阅读。脱靴、醉中奉诏等故事是有出处的传承,但具体场景和离京的唯一原因不能据此确定。 李白:《對酒憶賀監》並序;李陽冰:《唐李翰林草堂集序》;《新唐書》卷202:李白傳;李白:《清平調》其一。
《南陵别儿童入京》写向西入京,通常系于742年,不是744年离京时所作的告别。《奉赠韦左丞丈二十二韵》本文从《杜诗详注》卷一作“骑驴十三载”;该注本同时记录诸本“三十载”及卢注“十三载”,因此属于传本与校注取舍,不把“三十”简单当作无源错字。杜诗是求荐语境,不是被逐离朝的记录。 李白:《南陵別兒童入京》;仇兆鰲:《杜詩詳註》卷一。
永王幕府与夜郎流放采用一般年表:756年末至757年初入幕,永王败后受牵连,后获流刑,759年途中遇赦。史传对参加原因、营救与定罪经过各有叙述,本文不替当事人构造唯一动机。《草堂集序》762年记病重授稿;捞月溺死属于后起传说,不据饮酒故事诊断死因。 李陽冰:《唐李翰林草堂集序》;《新唐書》卷202:李白傳;《舊唐書》卷190下:李白與杜甫。
《将进酒》采用本文列出的常见传本,保留全篇,包括陈王宴平乐、主人少钱、马裘换酒诸句。“杯莫停/君莫停”“不复醒/不用醒/不愿醒”等存在异文,本文用“杯莫停”“不愿醒”,不宣布其为唯一原本。《静夜思》采用后世广为传诵的“明月光/望明月”本,同时交代“看月光/望山月”等传本。 李白:《將進酒》及異文;李白:《靜夜思》的傳本;李白:《月下獨酌》其一;李白:《把酒問月》。
《戏赠杜甫》保留为传为李白之作,归属与字句有争论;参考霞绍晖《李白杜甫交谊考论》的在线注释资料,并与《沙丘城下寄杜甫》《鲁郡东石门送杜二甫》及杜甫《梦李白》并读。不能按存诗数量给友情打分。闻一多的日月相遇是后世的文学比喻;杨万里的“李神于诗,杜圣于诗”见《诗人玉屑》卷十四所传。 杜甫:《夢李白二首》;李白:《沙丘城下寄杜甫》;李白:《魯郡東石門送杜二甫》;《詩人玉屑》卷十四:楊萬里論李杜;霞紹暉:《李白杜甫交誼考論》(2013)在線注釋。
诗的说话者、夸张与意象不等于逐句自传。“飞”“混沌”“凿与构”及桥头群像属于本系列的阅读与想象;不以现代科学定理证明诗学,也不把才华与劳动、人间之忧与宇宙之愁分成互不相通的两类人。英语和其余外语中的诗句均据古典原文为本篇重新拟写,不沿用现代译者成稿。 李白:《夢遊天姥吟留別》。
I. The Exiled Immortal
742, the first Tianbao year. Li Bai was in his early forties. At last the imperial summons arrived, and his life at the court in Chang’an began.
He Zhizhang called him an “exiled immortal.” This is not merely a later biographer’s invention: the preface to Li Bai’s Remembering He Zhizhang over Wine recalls their first encounter at Chang’an’s Purple Ultimate Palace, and He’s exchanging his golden tortoise ornament for wine. A contemporary’s delighted recognition grew into an image that would cover an entire life.
An immortal sent down to earth. Not the sage of poetry, not its Buddha. The name does not explain the whole man, but it catches a sensation his poems can produce: the voice has arrived among us while its source still seems beyond the sky.
With Du Fu, we watched reality enter poetry again and again. With Li Bai, another force often reaches us first. A sentence takes off, and the ordinary measures of rank, distance and daily life cannot keep up.
In this series’ language of carving and building, Du Fu makes the pressures of formation visible; Li Bai suggests the surge before a shape has settled. Both possessed gifts, both worked. Their poems bring different centres of gravity to the reader.
Zhuangzi’s Hundun—the not-yet-divided—can provisionally name that impression. Li Bai’s poetry sometimes takes us to a place where our categories have not quite found their footing, as though the voice arrives before its name.
II. Origins Unsettled
There are genuinely unresolved questions about Li Bai’s family and birthplace.
He and the early biographical tradition connected his family with the Lis of Longxi; Li Yangbing’s Preface to the Thatched Cottage Collection called him a ninth-generation descendant of Li Gao, ruler of Western Liang. An ancestral story survives, with links we cannot independently establish.
Suyab in Central Asia and Sichuan remain important alternatives in discussions of his birthplace. His upbringing in Sichuan is much firmer ground. A merchant background and exclusion from examinations on that account have also been proposed to explain his career; those questions remain disputed.
Some details of his beginnings disappear into the mist. His family, home and attachments do not disappear with them. Our incomplete knowledge does not make him a person who belonged nowhere.
Du Fu’s scholarly family and his wish to raise his sovereign above Yao and Shun gave his poetry a clear direction. War, hunger and separation from loved ones carried that concern far beyond a career. An appointment could not fill every absence in a life.
Li Bai, too, wanted to accomplish something in public life. He sought patrons in letters, imagined great achievements, cultivated Daoist friendships and received Daoist initiation. Between court and landscape, engagement and withdrawal, both directions genuinely moved him.
His freedom need not come from having no roots. A more compelling possibility is to have wishes, relationships and a place—and still refuse to let one place tell the whole story of who you are.
III. Laughing as He Goes Out
From 742 to 744, Li Bai spent roughly two years at court. The beginning of that experience was hope.
Leaving the Children at Nanling to Enter the Capital gives that departure a famous laugh:
I throw my head up, laugh, and leave the door—
Are people like us to remain among the weeds?
Earlier in the poem, children tug at his clothes; then he declares that he is leaving home to travel west into Qin. On the usual dating, he is answering the imperial summons, heading toward Chang’an. The laugh holds the hope of recognition, the conviction that he need no longer remain buried in the weeds.
The door still opens; the laugh still rings. But he is walking toward the place that will disappoint him. Knowing this does not diminish the poem. It adds the brightness of a future not yet disclosed.
At Chang’an he served in the Hanlin, close to the emperor but without a chief minister’s administrative authority. Li Yangbing describes consultation on affairs of state and the drafting of imperial documents; biographies also record commissioned poems. His hopes for political action did not coincide with the court position he received.
“Clouds call to mind her robes, flowers her face; a spring breeze brushes the rail, the dew glistens richly.” The Qingping Melodies set cloud, blossom and beauty reflecting one another. Yang Guifei, the Aloeswood Pavilion, drunken composition and Gao Lishi removing his boots gather into a court story across differing accounts. Its details shift, while the tension between favour and misfit remains.
Then he left with an imperial gift of gold. Li Yangbing describes colleagues’ slander and the emperor’s growing distance; the New History of the Tang also says that Li Bai requested leave for the mountains. The laughter of arrival had reached a disappointed departure. The court had not made room for all his hopes.
Du Fu’s poem presented to Vice Director Wei reads “thirteen years riding a donkey,” followed by living on others’ hospitality in the capital, knocking at wealthy doors in the morning and following well-fed horses’ dust at dusk. Here is another voice of frustrated aspiration. Li Bai’s bright anticipation and Du Fu’s appeal for patronage have their own circumstances, and each carries a hope not yet answered.
Li Bai also asks, at the end of Dreaming of a Journey to Mount Tianmu: “How could I lower my brows and bend my back to serve the powerful, denying my heart its ease?” Put that refusal beside the earlier laughter, and we begin to hear the tension between wanting to be employed and refusing to bow.
Nor did history spare his later years. In late 756 or early 757, during the An Lushan rebellion, he joined Prince Yong’s staff. After the prince’s conflict with Emperor Suzong’s government ended in defeat, Li Bai was imprisoned and subsequently sentenced to distant exile in Yelang. In 759 he received a pardon on the journey, before reaching his destination.
He made judgments and choices and bore consequences. Lightness in poetry and weight in a life remained together in one person.
The difference between Li Bai and Du Fu is therefore not that one sought office and the other never did. Faced with the distance between desire and reality, they let language assume different postures.
IV. Bring the Wine
Bring the Wine uses an inherited Music Bureau title and became one of Li Bai’s best-known drinking poems. Read the whole poem in a familiar transmitted form, and let its current run from the opening to the final line.
Do you not see the Yellow River pouring from the sky,
racing to the sea, with no return?
Do you not see, before the lofty hall’s bright mirror, grief for whitening hair—
dark silk at dawn, by evening snow?
When life grants satisfaction, let joy reach its fullness;
do not leave the golden cup empty before the moon.
Heaven brought forth my gifts: surely they have a use;
a thousand in gold, scattered, can return.
Cook the sheep and butcher the ox; let us rejoice;
at one sitting we must drink three hundred cups.
Master Cen, Danqiu, my friend: bring the wine, keep the cups moving.
I shall sing you a song; incline your ears and hear me.
Bells and drums, food precious as jade: I do not prize them;
I only wish for lasting drunkenness, never to awake.
Sages and worthies since antiquity have all been left in silence;
only the drinkers have kept their names.
Long ago the Prince of Chen feasted at Pingle,
wine costing ten thousand a measure, unbridled laughter and delight.
Why does our host speak of too little money?
Go straight out, buy wine, and pour with me.
The flower-maned horse, the thousand-gold fur coat—
tell the boy to take them, trade them for good wine;
with you I shall dissolve the grief of all the ages.
“Heaven brought forth my gifts”: we can hear self-affirmation exceeding any particular appointment. My value is not entirely for a court to approve. We might call it an affirmation of existence. The voice must first stand for itself, while still hoping its gifts will find a place in the world.
The forgotten sages are followed by remembered drinkers, then by Cao Zhi, the Prince of Chen, brought into the banquet. Exaggeration, anger, pride and disappointment are mixed in the cup. Poetry turns a familiar hierarchy upside down: what usually commands respect grows light, while the cup suddenly weighs enough to hold off the ages.
“The grief of all the ages” puts the cup on time’s scale. Water does not return; black hair turns white; a lifetime passes almost at once. Three hundred cups and the priceless coat glow within that excess. The amplitude is not absence of sorrow. Sorrow swells until the voice swells too.
When Du Fu speaks of spending the years anxious for ordinary people, we hear hunger, cold and conscription. When Li Bai would dissolve the grief of the ages, we hear passing time itself. One brings the lens close to human lives; the other suddenly draws it back toward the cosmos. These are emphases, not exclusive jurisdictions: Li Bai also wrote of war and common people; Du Fu also questioned heaven and earth.
And there is “with you.” He calls friends to drink beside him. Cosmic sorrow has not abolished the people at the table. The voice reaching toward infinity still wants someone to listen.
V. The Moon
The moon returns throughout Li Bai’s poetry with an intimacy that can be remote as the heavens or close as a bedside.
Bright moonlight before the bed—
I wonder if it is frost on the ground.
I raise my head toward the bright moon;
I lower it and think of home.
This is the widely recited later form of Quiet Night Thoughts. Earlier witnesses have “look at moonlight” and “mountain moon.” Many children first meet Tang poetry through these four lines. A raised head, a lowered head: a tiny movement lets a distant home enter the present.
He grew up in Sichuan, had a family and lived in several places. “Home” never becomes a precise address within the poem, leaving room for many people’s homesickness. We can follow the moonlight further, toward a place of return that seems beyond the earth. That is another path the poem opens to its readers.
I lift my cup and invite the bright moon;
with my shadow, the company becomes three.
Drinking Alone beneath the Moon turns a person, a moon and a shadow into a party. Yet the next lines acknowledge that the moon cannot understand drinking and the shadow merely follows his body. The poet has not forgotten the limits of these companions. Knowing those limits makes the feast both lively and lonely.
People now cannot see the moon of ancient days;
this moon once cast its light on people long ago.
Questioning the Moon over Wine lets ancient and present people meet under a single moon. People pass; the moon still hangs there, bringing that long duration before us. Beside Du Fu’s wish for rooms sheltering all the cold scholars, one voice faces a multitude while the other places human beings in time. Both begin with human finitude.
Later legend supplied a lunar ending: drunk in a boat, Li Bai reached for the moon reflected in the water, fell and drowned. Closer to the end of his life, Li Yangbing’s preface of 762 instead records severe illness and manuscripts entrusted from a sickbed. The moon on the water belongs to legend; the sickbed and poems awaiting an editor leave another kind of quiet.
Why did the legend endure? It gathered moon, wine, water and the ungraspable into a single image readers already recognized. His hand reaches not for the moon but for a reflection. That picture illuminates later imagination; it cannot replace the sick human being who needed care.
VI. Li Bai and Du Fu
In 744, usually located at Luoyang, Li Bai met Du Fu. By traditional reckoning they were forty-four and thirty-three. They travelled together, and met again in the Qi–Lu region in 745.
Much later, Wen Yiduo compared their meeting to an encounter of sun and moon. Across the distance of centuries, a literary historian could still marvel at that moment.
Travels with Gao Shi in the Liang–Song region, followed by meetings in Qi and Lu, left traces of visits, drinking, discussion of poems and the search for Daoist teachers. Du Fu’s lines about drinking deeply, singing wildly and asking for whose sake his friend was so proudly untamed let us hear both exhilaration and a question.
Then they separated. The time spent together was limited; the echoes in poems were long.
My old friend enters my dream: how constantly I remember him.
Caps and carriages crowd the capital; this man alone is worn and gaunt.
A name for a thousand autumns, ten thousand years—
but after death, what lonely business.
These lines from Du Fu’s Dreaming of Li Bai admire more than poetic talent. They fear for a friend. Enduring fame cannot shelter a living body from the wind. Du Fu sees not just an immortal, but someone who could be lost among the storms.
Fewer poems addressed to Du Fu survive under Li Bai’s name, but numbers do not weigh affection. Writing from Sand Dune City, he sends longing as broad as the Wen River toward his friend travelling south. Taking Leave of Du Fu at the Eastern Stone Gate, he asks when they will open their golden cups together again. A river of longing and the hope of another feast are not indifference.
There is also the poem traditionally attributed to him as A Playful Gift to Du Fu:
On Rice-Grain Hill I meet Du Fu,
a bamboo hat on his head beneath the midday sun.
Why have you grown so thin since we parted?
All that hard work making poems, surely.
Its attribution and wording have long been disputed. The poem makes a companionable joke of poetic labour, leaving a sunlit meeting, a hat, a question about a thin face. We can hear humour and closeness there; each man’s struggle was longer than those four lines.
Du Fu’s “Bai has no equal in poetry; his soaring thoughts stand apart” is real admiration. The longing in Li Bai’s poems has its weight too. An uneven surviving record does not confine the men to admirer and admired.
Posterity joined them as “Li–Du.” In a two-stroke drawing, one flies and one walks; one makes language rise and one makes it carry weight. A vivid drawing, provided neither person is reduced to that single side.
Yang Wanli’s Song-dynasty criticism, transmitted in such works as Jade Fragments of the Poets, calls Li divine in poetry and Du sagely in it. One seems to ride the wind, the other to carry a way of living: two different artistic attainments.
In the finest poems, work sometimes seems to disappear. Seeming to disappear is not the same as never having happened.
VII. Hundun Speaking
We can now return to Li Bai’s place in this series.
Carving and building have been our recurring terms for loosening received answers and making worlds that can be inhabited. Bring the earlier figures together once more.
Socrates questions knowledge; Confucius questions benevolence and ritual; Laozi unsettles names; Zhuangzi loosens fixed boundaries. Kant draws limits, Nietzsche carries a hammer, Wang Yangming turns inward. Shakyamuni investigates attachment; Jesus, suffering, still points toward giving.
Gödel reveals limits of formal systems; Einstein changes the physical picture of space and time. Du Fu lets reality enter verse, while the epic tradition represented by Homer carries voice toward writing. Qin Shi Huang concentrates power, Washington relinquishes it, Alexander pushes conquest outward.
Darwin studies life’s transformations; Newton describes the world through laws of motion and gravitation. Bach weaves voices; Beethoven composes after losing his hearing; Sima Qian continues history after devastating humiliation. These are silhouettes of the preceding lives, not attempts to replace a person with one verb.
Is Li Bai absent from that company?
The historical Li Bai is certainly among them. He reads, reworks inherited Music Bureau titles, chooses words, cultivates relationships, enters the court and suffers political upheaval. He builds poems and is changed by the world.
Yet in some of his lines the first thing we sense is not a tool’s mark but water suddenly welling up. As though form has not yet shut its doors and the Yellow River is already falling from the sky.
“Before the carving” names that astonishment: words have plainly been placed, one after another, yet what rushes toward us feels like water no one arranged.
Zhuangzi’s story of Hundun asks us to notice the cost of boring openings into the undivided. Li Bai’s flight lets us imagine a voice not yet held still. Two different pictures illuminate one another in the act of reading.
Hear “Heaven brought forth my gifts” again this way: before others assign my use, I have begun to speak. But speaking still needs language, older poems and listeners if it is to become a work.
Perhaps that is precisely where the craft lies: the inherited form holds the voice, while the sentence’s movement takes us by surprise. A river need not lose its banks for us to feel its force.
If we still say “Hundun itself is speaking,” let it be a reader’s astonishment. Not that genius did no work, but that the work lets us hear something as though it had never been made.
VIII. Flying
Return to the imagined bridge of this series.
Another person has arrived. But he is not standing at the bridgehead. He is above the bridge, flying.
Cracks lie beneath Qin Shi Huang; soil beneath Washington. Beethoven clenches a fist; Sima Qian’s back is slightly bent; Du Fu wears torn sleeves. Every posture carries an echo of the earlier essays.
Li Bai does not stand. Li Bai flies.
We entrust him with poetry’s lightness. He passes over planks, soil and cracks, over the others’ heads. It is not that he stands higher: one voice has suddenly found another way of travelling.
He looks down and sees Du Fu walking. Come and fly with me.
But Du Fu still carries his wish for ten thousand rooms. Benevolence is not a nail punishing him; it is an attachment he will not put down. Li Bai has attachments too. For this moment his voice has moved one step ahead of their weight.
Flight then reveals its cost. The moon seems a friend, the shadow a companion, wine lifts the voice. Yet the moon will not answer, the shadow cannot reach out to support a person, and when drunkenness ends a body must return to earth.
He looks so free, and so lonely. Yet on the roads of his life another person has sometimes reached him.
Du Fu’s solitude holds suffering in the human world that has not been heard. Li Bai’s holds the distance of a flight that cannot be shared. Between those solitudes, they once walked together and wrote poems for one another.
“I lift my cup and invite the bright moon.” Solitude does not seal him shut. It urges an invitation toward something that has not answered.
Freedom here is not the absence of relationship. It is the continuing extension of a hand when existing relationships cannot wholly satisfy a person.
The bridgehead is crowded: some stand, some bend, some clench their fists, some figures have already faded. In the sky, a man holds a cup.
He looks down and sees them all. Then he looks up and sees the moon.
He chooses the moon.
Notes
Dates follow the usual 701–762 chronology. This makes Li Bai about forty-one in 742, or forty-two by traditional reckoning; the 744 ages of forty-four and thirty-three for Li Bai and Du Fu also use the traditional count. Birthplace, migration, ethnicity and a possible merchant background have different degrees of evidential support. The two Tang histories contain disagreements and shaped biographical narratives; see Nienhauser’s study of the Old History. Li Yangbing: Preface to the Thatched Cottage Collection; New History of the Tang, volume 202: Li Bai; Old History of the Tang, volume 190, lower part; William H. Nienhauser Jr.: A Reading of Li Bo’s Biography in the Old History of the Tang (2002).
The exiled-immortal name is attested in Li Bai’s preface to Remembering He Zhizhang over Wine as well as the New History of the Tang. The Hanlin account draws on Li Yangbing and the histories. Boot-removal and drunken composition are documented traditions, not sufficient evidence for every detail of a scene or a single cause of departure. Li Bai: Remembering He Zhizhang over Wine; Li Yangbing: Preface to the Thatched Cottage Collection; New History of the Tang, volume 202: Li Bai; Li Bai: Qingping Melodies, first poem.
Leaving the Children at Nanling describes travelling west into the capital, usually dated 742, not departure from the court in 744. For Du Fu’s poem to Wei, this essay follows Qiu Zhao’ao’s Detailed Annotations on Du Fu, volume 1, in reading thirteen years. That edition also records thirty in other witnesses and thirteen in Lu’s commentary. This is an editorial choice between transmitted readings, not a correction of an unattested typo. The poem concerns seeking patronage, not expulsion from court. Li Bai: Leaving the Children at Nanling to Enter the Capital; Qiu Zhao’ao: Detailed Annotations on Du Fu, volume 1.
The conventional sequence is entry into Prince Yong’s staff in late 756 or early 757, punishment after his defeat, a subsequent sentence of exile, and pardon on the road in 759. Accounts of motive, rescue and judgment differ. Li Yangbing’s 762 preface describes serious illness and manuscripts entrusted from a bed. The drowning while reaching for the moon is later legend; no medical cause of death is diagnosed here. Li Yangbing: Preface to the Thatched Cottage Collection; New History of the Tang, volume 202: Li Bai; Old History of the Tang, volume 190, lower part.
Bring the Wine is given in full, including Cao Zhi’s Pingle feast, the host’s lack of money, and the horse and fur exchanged for wine. Chinese readings vary, including ‘cups/you must not stop’ and several forms of ‘not wake’; this essay uses 杯莫停 and 不愿醒 without claiming a uniquely original text. Quiet Night Thoughts follows the widely recited later bright-moon wording and acknowledges earlier ‘look at moonlight’ and ‘mountain moon’ readings. Li Bai: Bring the Wine, with variant readings; Li Bai: Quiet Night Thoughts, transmitted versions; Li Bai: Drinking Alone beneath the Moon; Li Bai: Questioning the Moon over Wine.
The playful verse to Du Fu remains a disputed attribution. The online notes to Xia Shaohui’s study of the friendship were consulted alongside Li Bai’s two substantial farewell/remembering poems and Du Fu’s Dreaming of Li Bai. Surviving quantities do not measure affection. Wen Yiduo’s sun-and-moon comparison is retrospective; Yang Wanli’s divine/sagely distinction is transmitted in Jade Fragments of the Poets, volume 14. Du Fu: Dreaming of Li Bai, two poems; Li Bai: To Du Fu from Sand Dune City; Li Bai: Taking Leave of Du Fu at the Eastern Stone Gate; Jade Fragments of the Poets, volume 14: Yang Wanli on Li and Du; Xia Shaohui: A study of the friendship of Li Bai and Du Fu (2013), online notes.
A poem’s speaker, hyperbole and images are not a line-by-line autobiography. Flight, Hundun, carving and building, and the bridge assembly are this series’ literary interpretation. They are not applications of scientific theorems and do not divide talent from labour or human grief from cosmic sorrow. All English and other foreign-language verse renderings were newly drafted from the classical Chinese for this essay, without adopting modern published translations. Li Bai: Dreaming of a Journey to Mount Tianmu.